Commons:Quality images candidates

Shortcut

• COM:QIC

↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

1. Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
2. Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
3. Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
4. No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

• If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

• If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

1. Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
2. Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
3. Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 2025.
4. Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

1. move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 2025.

• Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
• Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
• Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 20 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 10:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

• Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
• Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
• Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
• If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

September 20, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: LMZ historical building part --Lvova 10:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Flowers in the Garden of Mariinsky Palace --Lvova 10:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kazanskaya street, 9 --Lvova 10:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Griboedov Canal Embankment, 31 --Lvova 10:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination 1940s lamp post, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tower crane arm seen from below, Alameda Dom Afonso Henriques, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of Portuguese calçada, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality and likely FP --Poco a poco 10:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Moon and buildings at sunset, Arroios, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Lisbon Zoo, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 10:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 11-101 in Tunisia.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smailtn --Houss 2020 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 13-22 in Tunisia.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smailtn --Houss 2020 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smailtn --Houss 2020 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cave paintings Jbal OusletThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 41-73 in Tunisia.This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smailtn --Houss 2020 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Elles megaliths TunisiaI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:Smailtn --Houss 2020 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lucid Air Grand Touring ait Geneva International Motor Show 2024 --MB-one 09:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Abstract sculpture in Park Staromiejski, Wroclaw --MB-one 09:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jetour Dasheng (pre-facelift) in Astana --MB-one 09:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tail of El Drac by Andrés Nagel in Parc de l'Espanya Industrial in Barcelona --MB-one 09:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: GAC Hyptec HL at IAA Summit 2025 in Munich --MB-one 09:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Monument Bitka za Sutjesko by Miodrag Živković in the Valley of the heroes. The monument was erected in memory of the fallen partisans in the Battle of Sutjeska. --Miha Peče 09:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Monument Bitka za Sutjesko by Miodrag Živković in the Valley of the heroes. The monument was erected in memory of the fallen partisans in the Battle of Sutjeska. --Miha Peče 09:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination House, Lauwbergstraat 23, in Lauwe, Belgium. --Velvet 08:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garage, Larstraat 22, in Lauwe, Belgium. --Velvet 08:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dämeritzsee in Erkner, Brandenburg, seen from the Rathauspark shore in the evening --Kritzolina 08:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dämeritzsee in Erkner, Brandenburg, seen from the Rathauspark shore in the evening light --Kritzolina 08:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dämeritzsee in Erkner, Brandenburg, seen from the Rathauspark shore in the evening light --Kritzolina 08:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Visitation chapel - Reliquary shrine of Saint Marguerite-Marie --Benjism89 07:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint-Claude-la-Colombière chapel - The exterior --Benjism89 07:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint-Claude-la-Colombière chapel - The interior --Benjism89 07:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint-Claude-la-Colombière chapel - Mosaic of the Sacred Heart --Benjism89 07:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint-Claude-la-Colombière chapel - Reliquary shrine of Claude-la-Colombière --Benjism89 07:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portrait de la comtesse Loménie de Brienne - Louis Tocqué --GoldenArtists 07:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Small habour in Bungenäs, Gotland. --ArildV 06:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Holy Trinity Church --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Annunciation Church Ruin --Mike1979 Russia 06:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the northeast on Heidelberg near Hambach towards Hambach Castle. --Syntaxys 06:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Some areas (on the castle) seem motion blurred at left. --Sebring12Hrs 10:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from the northeast on Heidelberg near Hambach towards Hambach Castle. --Syntaxys 06:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:06, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from the southeast near Maikammer of Hambach Castle near Neustadt an der Weinstraße. --Syntaxys 06:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The left area of the picture, especially in the trees, is blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 10:06, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milvus migrans (Black Kite) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milvus migrans (Black Kite) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Milvus migrans (Black Kite) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Milvus migrans (Black Kite) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:33, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Actitis hypoleucos (Common Sandpiper) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Castor church in Karden, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:45, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Servatius church in Landkern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Pancratius church in Kaisersesch, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:06, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the St Matthew church in Ulmen, Rhineland-Pal., Germany. --Tournasol7 06:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:30, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building at Maximilianstraße 35 in Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:30, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View across the Iller at the run-of-the-river-power-station Keselstraße to the Baumwoll-Spinnerei und Weberei in Kempten --FlocciNivis 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment QI IMO, but several dust spots --Lmbuga 06:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A statue inside the church St. Sebald in Nuremberg --FlocciNivis 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An information board at the Inn-Bridge in Mühldorf am Inn --FlocciNivis 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:07, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose The image should be cropped to avoid the traffic sign. Otherwise good. --Lmbuga 06:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The building of Fischkate at the Hildesheimer Straße 50 in Laatzen --FlocciNivis 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The relief of a face, part of the fountain in the courtyard of the Bräunerstraße 3 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry, surprisingly greenish: Poor black and white balance. The detail, probably due to excessive noise and perhaps motion blur --Lmbuga 06:17, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów 1 --Jacek Halicki 05:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów 3 --Jacek Halicki 05:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów 4 --Jacek Halicki 05:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 05:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów 4 --Jacek Halicki 05:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 05:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów 5 --Jacek Halicki 05:47, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 05:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de Chambord (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 05:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:49, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de Villesavin (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 05:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:49, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de Valençay (view from the east) --Carsten Steger 05:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de La Ferté-Imbault (view from the east) --Carsten Steger 05:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Dent d'Hérens (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 05:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The main building of the salt works in Friedrichshall --Ermell 05:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrichshall Saltworks (Lindenau) in Friedrichshall, aerial view --Ermell 05:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrichshall Saltworks (Lindenau) in Friedrichshall, aerial view --Ermell 05:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment The buildings on the right side of the image (somewhat distant) are not leaning, but the building on the left side (nearer) are leaning significantly. --Lmbuga 06:01, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bottles in the main building of the salt works in Friedrichshall --Ermell 05:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bottles in the main building of the salt works in Friedrichshall --Ermell 05:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:45, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Left valve of the white form of a Toothed Donax, Donax denticulatus --Llez 05:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Office of the Regional Fire Officer, Mysore, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 05:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:52, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laundry drying on the bank of the Kabini River, Nanjangud, Mysore district --Tagooty 05:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 05:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Antique vase, Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, Colaba, Mumbai --Tagooty 05:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Oppose Detail too low and seems slightly out of focus --FlocciNivis 05:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    Focus looks good to me - see the sign on the right. Very smooth jade has less detail. Let's hear other opinions. --Tagooty 06:10, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hotel Tamilnadu (Tamil Nadu Tourism Beach Resort Complex), Mahabalipuram --Tagooty 05:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Road to Gandhipuram from NH-181, Coonoor, Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India --Tagooty 05:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cinemateca Brasileira and its bricks at the entrance --Boaventuravinicius 04:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nice wall, but the image is absolutely not sharp. --Екатерина Борисова 04:28, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach nourishment and distribution of sand with a bulldozer, beach nourishment at western head of the island, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach nourishment and distribution of sand with a bulldozer, beach nourishment at western head of the island, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:28, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stock anchor on Georgshöhe, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:12, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former storm signal station on Georgshöhe, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination “Kur-Apotheke”, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:29, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road on the south coast of Flores Island, Indonesia, with Mules Island in the background --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Comment The bottom third of the image is very blurry and the sky could be cropped a little. I think the photo would be nicer if it were cropped. --Lmbuga 05:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    I like the composition as it is, so I would like to ask for more opinions --Jakubhal 05:50, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment On second thought, I have updated framing, but only slightly --Jakubhal 08:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise over southern districts of Kraków --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former brewery in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate of the former monastery guesthouse (now rectory) in Obertheres --Plozessor 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins of Saint Michael's chapel on the Michelsberg near Münnerstadt --Plozessor 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:27, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Frenchmen stone" near Hummelmarter --Plozessor 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Summit of the Schneeberg with "Backöfele" ('little baking oven') observation tower and former military radio monitoring tower --Plozessor 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 03:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sufficiently sharp for standing geese --Tagooty 05:17, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow-billed egret (Ardea brachyrhyncha), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 03:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow-billed egret (Ardea brachyrhyncha), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 03:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination African bush elephant (Ardea melanocephala), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 03:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Discussion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    The caption and description are incorrect --Tagooty 05:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black-headed heron (Ardea melanocephala), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 03:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of lion head on former Anglares house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of lion head on former Anglares house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:30, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atlant at the entance of former Anglares house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of lion head on former Muyaki revenue house, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:13, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:29, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gomphotherium sp. (TMP 1995.048.0001, detail), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; cast, Neogene --Crisco 1492 00:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:44, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gomphotherium sp. (TMP 1995.048.0001, detail), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; cast, Neogene --Crisco 1492 00:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    In my opinion, the skull should not be cut off. Unfortunately, the lighting is not very conducive to such photographs, but you can't change that in a museum. --Syntaxys 01:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gorgosaurus libratus juvenile with stomach contents (TMP 2009.012.0014), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; original, Campanian, found at Belly River --Crisco 1492 00:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 01:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gorgosaurus libratus juvenile (TMP 2019.000.0034), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; cast, Campanian, found at Belly River --Crisco 1492 00:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 01:57, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Albertosaurus sarcophagus skull (TMP 1985.098.0001), Royal Tyrrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, 2025-07-13; original and cast, Maastrichtian, from Horseshoe Canyon --Crisco 1492 00:18, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:45, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Convent of Santo Agostiño. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the façade of the Church of Santo Agostiño. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa María de Mezonzo, Vilasantar, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa María de Mezonzo, Vilasantar, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa María de Mezonzo, Vilasantar, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

September 19, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Tugboat, Ocean Stevns, passing by Ogden Point, heading into Victoria Harbor, BC Canada. --GRDN711 21:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tugboat, Ocean Stevns, passing by Ogden Point, heading into Victoria Harbor, BC Canada. --GRDN711 21:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pętla tramwajowo-autobusowa „Górka Narodowa” w Krakowie, w Dzielnicy XII IV Prądnik Biały.Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższych licencjachMożesz wybrać, którą licencję chcesz zastosować. --Igor123121 20:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pętla tramwajowo-autobusowa „Górka Narodowa” w Krakowie, w Dzielnicy XII IV Prądnik Biały.Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższych licencjachMożesz wybrać, którą licencję chcesz zastosować. --Igor123121 20:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Tilted, and perspective distortion --Jakubhal 04:00, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pętla tramwajowo-autobusowa „Górka Narodowa” w Krakowie, w Dzielnicy XII IV Prądnik Biały.Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższych licencjachMożesz wybrać, którą licencję chcesz zastosować. --Igor123121 20:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ulica Papierni Prądnickich w Krakowie, w Dzielnicy XII IV Prądnik Biały. Torowisko tramwajowe.Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższych licencjachMożesz wybrać, którą licencję chcesz zastosować. --Igor123121 20:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ulica Papierni Prądnickich w Krakowie, w Dzielnicy XII IV Prądnik Biały. Widok na północ.Ja, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższych licencjachMożesz wybrać, którą licencję chcesz zastosować. --Igor123121 20:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ivar Loe Bjørnstad on stage with Hedvig Mollestad Trio, 2025 --Birdesigns 19:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:59, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination West view of the Church of the Assumption in Maximiliansau. --Syntaxys 18:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roundabout artwork in Neupotz --Syntaxys 18:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trümmerfrauen Memorial in Mannheim --Syntaxys 18:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Art Déco building in Marcinelle, Belgium --Jmh2o 18:51, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hamburg-Neugraben, Francoper Straße 45, main building --KaiBorgeest 17:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:19, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination: Outbuilding in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Review needed
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination: Outbuilding in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Konradów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manor in Konradów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of the Exaltation of the Cross in Konradów by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naked Woman statue (1933) by Ruy Gameiro (1907-1935), Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Naked Woman statue (1933) by Ruy Gameiro (1907-1935), Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 18:49, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nossa Senhora da Penha de França Convent at sunrise, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nook in Portuguese pavement to allow for tree root, Avenida de Roma, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Building designed by Cassiano Branco with the "Homem da Marreta" statue by António Santos, Avenida de Roma 54, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 16:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A person with a flying kite in front of the hill with cross on it in the Landschaftspark Hachinger Tal --FlocciNivis 16:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Liesl Stub'n Preysinghof, part of the Ensemble Preysing- und Ludwigplatz in Plattling --FlocciNivis 16:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The chapel St. Rochus und St. Sebastian in Sollach --FlocciNivis 16:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 16:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The pedestrian tunnel underneath the Oskar-von-Miller-Ring as Munich Art Tunnel with Graffit --FlocciNivis 16:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View along the Isarring and the cemetery wall of the Nordfriedhof Munich --FlocciNivis 16:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View towards North from Namsan. --Kallerna 16:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:05, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yacare caiman in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 15:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yacare caiman in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 15:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 16:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roadside hawk in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 15:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Azaras's capuchin in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 15:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hyacinth macaw with a Pink Ipê tree in the background in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 15:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Papilio agenor Linnaeus, 1758 - Great Mormon. By User:Subhendukhan --Atudu 14:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Nominated twice, the first nomination is still on the page. Still blurry. Red category is not a good categorisation. --Lvova 15:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lethe maitrya (de Nicéville, 1881) - Barred Woodbrown. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    No categories. --Lvova 15:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lethe sura ( Doubleday,1849) - Lilacfork. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is no thematic categories. --Lvova 15:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lethe wui (Huang, 1999) - Golden Mystic. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Bad focus. --Lvova 15:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neope pulaha ( Moore,1858) - Veined Labyrinth. By User:Atanu Bose Photography --Atudu 14:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is no thematic categories. --Lvova 15:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jazz musician Per Zanussi receives the Kongsberg Jazz Award in 2023 --Birdesigns 14:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Quality is OK, but the image is tilted (all poles in the background are leaning in the same direction) and it looks like this image was downscaled --Benjism89 18:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capitals of the Church of San Fiz de Solovio. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 15:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa María de Mezonzo, Vilasantar, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 15:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Santa María de Mezonzo, Vilasantar, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 13:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 15:54, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal --Sumitsurai 11:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Terracotta panels of the Lakkhi Janardan Temple in Ghurisha, Birbhum, West Bengal --Sumitsurai 11:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I understand that these panels are probably not perfectly straight in reality, but I would do a little PC to make lines as horizontal and vertical as possible. And a little extra contrast wouldn't do no harm --Benjism89 18:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Previously unassessed. It was commented about PC need, but this geometry reflects reality imo, so I hope to receive more opinions. --Lvova 10:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose PC not done, this is not a low-angle shot, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 10:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oranzhereynaya street --Lvova 10:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 13:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apraksin Lane --Lvova 10:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tsentralnaya street --Lvova 10:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lake Klinje in Bosnia --Miha PEče 10:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 16:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Masai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya. --Yiyi 09:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lioness (Panthera leo) in the Masai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya. --Yiyi 09:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Good IMO, but CAs. --Lmbuga 13:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: African buffalos (Syncerus caffer) in the Masai Mara Game Reserve, Kenya. --Yiyi 09:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Caiello cemetery in Gallarate, Italy. --Yiyi 09:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Dust spots, blurred, noise, perspective issues... --Sebring12Hrs 10:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the Santa Maria Annunciata church in Oggiona con Stanto Stefano, Italy. --Yiyi 09:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose So many dust spots. --Sebring12Hrs 10:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château d'Ancy-le-Franc (view from the south) --Carsten Steger 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Vézelay Abbey (view from the southwest) --Carsten Steger 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de La Bussière, Loiret (view from the south) --Carsten Steger 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Dent d'Hérens (view from the northeast) --Carsten Steger 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Weisshorn and Bishorn (view from the east) --Carsten Steger 08:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - Columns of the narthex --Benjism89 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - The North portal --Benjism89 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - The apse --Benjism89 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Visitation chapel - Portal --Benjism89 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Visitation chapel - Interior --Benjism89 06:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the Kapplerhaus at Linzer Straße 30 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower of the lutheran church in Wels, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kremsmuenstererhof at Stadtplatz 62-63 in Wels, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palais Salburg at Kaiser-Josef-Platz 12 in Wels, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palace of Schönbrunn in Vienna, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Underexposed and you should have a tighter crop at bottom and right IMO --Benjism89 18:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Outbuilding in Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cowshed in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cowshed in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cowshed in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cowshed in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 4 --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk St Nicholas Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Dormition of the Theotokos Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Uspensko-Bogorodichny Monastery Fences --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Ascension of Christ Church Detail --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Ascension of Christ Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Administrative building at Friedrichshaller Str. 90, formerly part of the Friedrichshall spa complex --Ermell 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the former inn of the former Friedrichshall spa resort --Ermell 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former inn of the former Friedrichshall spa resort --Ermell 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:07, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bottles in the main building of the salt works in Friedrichshall --Ermell 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support A little bit too small Dof, but imho good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bottles in the main building of the salt works in Friedrichshall --Ermell 05:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of the white form of a Toothed Donax, Donax denticulatus --Llez 05:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crossing between Teheran-ro and Yeongdong-daero in Gangnam --Kallerna 05:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:07, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Myeng-dong from PJ Hotel, Seoul. --Kallerna 05:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dune landscape with fingerposts in the Lower Saxony Wadden Sea National Park (quiet zone), Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boat off Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Original artistic choices, and I think it works here --Benjism89 18:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coastal protection wall on the dike crest at the western head of the island, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sea rescue cruiser “Otto Schülke” in the marina, harbour, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:23, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Biblioasis, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-01 --Crisco 1492 03:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dayspring Church of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-01 --Crisco 1492 03:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dr. Freeman Brockenshire House, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-01 --Crisco 1492 03:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dr. Freeman Brockenshire House, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-01 --Crisco 1492 03:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ernest G. Henderson House, Windsor, Ontario, 2025-07-01 --Crisco 1492 03:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone cross east of Rügheim --Plozessor 03:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief at "MInstrels' square" in Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 03:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Back of stone cross west of Westheim (Knetzgau) --Plozessor 03:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Käßlitz (Heldburg) --Plozessor 03:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial above Warmensteinach (Inscription 1939 - 1945) --Plozessor 03:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief and wires under very dusty window of listed building, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cultural Heritage plaque on former Breadcrumbs Factory building, Kronshtadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Apollino statue, Granite Terrace in Catherine Park, Pushkin town, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 02:52, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Masai Mara, Kenya --Poco a poco 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Masai Mara, Kenya --Poco a poco 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helmeted guineafowl (Numida meleagris), Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Egyptian geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 01:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Here-lived plaque (Rosalía de Castro and Manuel Murguía), A Universidade square, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in the Market square of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 00:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:01, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

September 18, 2025

• 
  • Nomination L'Amour captif by Félix Sanzel, in the Jardin des plantes in Paris, France. --Phyrexian 23:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L'Amour captif by Félix Sanzel, in the Jardin des plantes in Paris, France. --Phyrexian 23:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination L'Amour captif by Félix Sanzel, in the Jardin des plantes in Paris, France. --Phyrexian 23:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of the Portail de la Vierge of the Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris, France. --Phyrexian 23:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment The quality is good, but I think there are CAs. --Lmbuga 00:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Imari ceramic plate in the Guimet Museum in Paris, France. --Phyrexian 23:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque commemorating the birthplace of Antonio López Ferreiro. Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 22:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque of the Galician Language Institute. Between Mazarelos Square and University Square, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 22:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 23:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan - Dome --Юрий Д.К. 21:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan - Tower --Юрий Д.К. 21:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment The picture quality is very good, but there is a dust spot to the right of the base of the cross. --Lmbuga 22:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Lmbuga: Hi, it has been removed, thanks! --Юрий Д.К. 09:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan - Dome --Юрий Д.К. 21:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Hamburg-Neugraben, Francoper Strasse 51, side building --KaiBorgeest 21:14, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hamburg, quarter Neugraben-Fischbek, Francoper Strasse 51, courtyard --KaiBorgeest 20:59, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination High-resolution depiction of a Minibrot inside a Mandelbrot set. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior view of the Catholic Church of the Assumption in Maximiliansau, looking towards the choir. --Syntaxys 19:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Interior view of the Catholic Church of the Assumption in Maximiliansau, looking towards the gallery with organ. --Syntaxys 19:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review The quality is good, but it bothers me that the murals at the borders are cut off --PantheraLeo1359531 20:13, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Yes, I agree now. When composing the shot, I was very focused on getting as much of the organ as possible despite the wide shot. In terms of focal length, I would have had some leeway. But the mural isn't completely in focus and I discovered some editing errors too. Therefore, I am withdrawing my nomination. Thank you very much for your review. --Syntaxys 03:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenbahnstraße with the Church of the Assumption in Maximiliansau. --Syntaxys 19:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dyes in various colors from the city of Essaouira--User:Mounir Neddi 20:13, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose I'm sorry, but with 1,874 × 2,787 pixels, the entire picture is somewhat blurry, and the bottom shelf and the cabinet are quite blurry. --Lmbuga 22:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saab JA-37 Viggen, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Saab J35 Draken number 35520, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lockheed F-104 Starfighter number R-855, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dam of the Neuer Teich near Zorge in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Linyphia triangularis --Romzig 17:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 18:49, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of the São João de Deus Church, Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cockspur coral tree (Erythrina crista-galli) roots, Jardim da Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Framed iron door, Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old telephone booth repurposed into a public bookcase, Praça de Londres, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:28, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Waste bags left at building entrance, Quirino da Fonseca Street, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The courtyard of the Bäckerstraße 7 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The courtyard of the Palais Erdödy-Fürstenberg in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angel sculptures above the entrance of the Kirche am Steinhof in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A stained-glass window in the Votive Church in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The former kitchen building on the Otto-Wagner-Areal in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 17:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 16:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 16:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 16:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 16:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thomson's gazelle (Eudorcas thomsonii), Amboseli National Park, Kenya --Poco a poco 16:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate of Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination Outbuilding in Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 1 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but sign with 4 tildas please. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination: Outbuilding in Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 2 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Review needed
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination: Outbuilding in Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Review needed
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination Outbuilding in Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 4 by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but sign with 4 tildas please. --Lvova 22:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Büdingen Castle in Büdingen, Hesse, Germany, seen from the west --Milseburg 14:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 15:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: two Velvet-Purple Coronets - Boissonneaua jardini --E bailey 14:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Animation --Aokoroko 13:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review I really love the color cycles, but I am note sure if 600px isn't a bit small (especially for structures like fractals), despite the large GIF filesize :( --PantheraLeo1359531 20:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC))
• 
  • Nomination Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Animation --Aokoroko 13:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mandelbrot Set Color Cycling Animation --Aokoroko 13:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - St. Basil's Cathedral --Юрий Д.К. 13:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 15:23, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Closewing puddling position of Lethe sura (Doubleday, [1849]) - Lilacfork. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 11:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noisy background, can be fixed. --Lvova 22:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upperwing position of Lethe scanda (Moore, [1858]) - Blue Forester. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 11:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closewing position of Rhaphicera satricus (Doubleday, [1849]) - Large Tawny Wall. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 11:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Closewing position of Hasora anura de Nicéville, 1889 - Slate Awl. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 11:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Noisy background, can be fixed. --Lvova 22:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closewing position of Choaspes furcata Evans, 1932 - Hooked Awlking. By User:MaheshBaruahwildlife --Atudu 11:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --E bailey 14:09, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Manezhnaya 8a, Lomonosov --Lvova 10:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Skuridina street --Lvova 10:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Studenetskiy lane --Lvova 10:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A free-roaming goose --Lvova 10:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Victoria Memorial Hall with its reflection, Kolkata. By User:Amitabha Gupta --Herpking 10:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks underexposed to me. --Milseburg 14:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose CAs and not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 21:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South American tapir in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 09:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Giant anteater in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 09:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:37, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gilded sapphire in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 09:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:35, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 15:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vermilion flycatcher in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 09:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vermilion flycatcher in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas, Brazil --Giles Laurent 09:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 09:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laxmi Narayan Temple, Orchha By User:ShiladityaM --Herpking 09:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Too unsharp. --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Painted ceilings of Laxmi Narayan Temple — Orchha By User:ShiladityaM --Herpking 09:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Orchha Fort Complex By User:ShiladityaM --Herpking 09:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Good quality, but it cannot be accepted without any description. --Lvova 22:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    I don't understand these pale magenta shadows along the contour of the window. They look like CA's. --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
    Description and caption added. --Herpking 07:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former towpath along the river Lys, in Lauwe, Belgium. --Velvet 07:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Path, along the E403, in Lauwe, Belgium. --Velvet 07:56, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rubber ducky mascot on a LuAZ-967 amphibious vehicle --MB-one 07:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Narrow alley in the old town of Split --MB-one 07:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mehmet Gürcan Karakaş, CEO of Togg presents the Togg T10X during a press conference at IAA Summit 2025 in Munich --MB-one 07:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 08:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exposed brickwork on a building in Ostrów Tumski in Wrocław --MB-one 07:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ohm's Villa, a listed art nouveau building in Meißen --MB-one 07:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 13:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 09:00, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Canal Vena in Chioggia --Miha Peče 07:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Radar station on Vojak mountain in Učka massif. --Miha Peče 07:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 14:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower house in Żelazno --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 25 Żelazno 1 --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 25 Żelazno 2 --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 25 Żelazno 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate of Magnis palace in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie --Jacek Halicki 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Irregular footpath laid on Vijayawada West Bypass bridge --I.Mahesh 06:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabacco Barn at Velagapudi --I.Mahesh 06:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The war memorial at St. Dionys Church in Esslingen (Neckar). --Syntaxys 06:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The town church of St. Dionysius and the market square in Esslingen (Neckar). --Syntaxys 06:36, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of the Palais Salburg in Wels, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint Stephen church in Wels, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palace of Schönbrunn in Vienna, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:49, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old town hall at Hauptplatz 19 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kapplerhaus at Linzer Straße 30 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 06:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de Montjeu (view from the south) --Carsten Steger 06:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Château de Cormatin (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 06:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Cluny Abbey (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 06:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Abbey of Fontenay (view from the southwest) --Carsten Steger 06:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of Aletschhorn (view from the southeast) --Carsten Steger 06:12, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - The basilica viewed from the opposite side of the Bourbince river --Benjism89 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - The towers of the basilica --Benjism89 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:14, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - Central portal --Benjism89 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - One of the capitals of the narthex --Benjism89 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paray-le-Monial (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Sacred Heart basilica - One of the capitals of the narthex --Benjism89 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a small land snail, Cochlicopa repentina measuring only 5.6 mm --Llez 05:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:59, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of St. Sebastian's Church in Autenhausen --Ermell 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of St. Sebastian's Church in Autenhausen --Ermell 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:02, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baptismal font in St. Sebastian's Church in Autenhausen --Ermell 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ in St. Sebastian's Church in Autenhausen --Ermell 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Mary in St. Sebastian's Church in Autenhausen --Ermell 05:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Kamenev House --Mike1979 Russia 05:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sviyazhsk Kamenev House --Mike1979 Russia 05:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kazan KRIB Water Intake --Mike1979 Russia 05:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kazan KRIB Water Intake --Mike1979 Russia 05:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sviyazhsk Medvedev — Brovkin House --Mike1979 Russia 05:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Windows of Pondicherry - Orange wall, UPVC window and Golden grill --I.Mahesh 05:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of Pondicherry - White wall, Blue window and Terracotta roof --I.Mahesh 05:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windows of Pondicherry - White wall, Green coloured window and grills --I.Mahesh 05:00, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Organ of St. Stephen's parish church in Eggenburg, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altar of St. Elizabeth at St. Stephen's parish church in Eggenburg, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, dated 1521. --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic pulpit of St. Stephen's parish church in Eggenburg, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Subsidiary church St. Athanasius in Berg im Drautal, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of the romanesque stained glass window devoted to St. Margaret (Margaretenfenster, 1230–40), collegiate church Ardagger, Lower Austria: Margaret is immersed in hot water --Uoaei1 04:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Komodo dragon, Komodo Island, Indonesia --Jakubhal 04:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stock anchor on Georgshöhe, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Remains of bridge in Ropsha Estate park, Ropsha, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Remains of bridge in Ropsha Estate park, Ropsha, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Honey bee on rose in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The main subject is taken in good quality, but is the rose or the bumblebee a cultural monument? --Syntaxys 03:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    Yes, this garden, where the rose is located, is completely recognized as a cultural monument. I try not to upload to WLM photos of modern details of historical gardens, such as trash cans or souvenir tents, but trees and flowers are natural elements of any garden. --Екатерина Борисова 03:39, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    According to QIC guidelines, an image should be correctly named and described. If I photograph an ordinary trash can in a protected historic town center as the main subject, then it is certainly not subject to monument protection. As I understand it, this subject has nothing to do with monument protection. I am expressly not evaluating the image in relation to the WLM competition guidelines, and from a technical point of view, it is well done. --Syntaxys 04:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    I have devoted more than ten years to studying the cultural heritage sites of Saint Petersburg and I know by heart the numbers of documents according to which one object ot another is under state protection. We have many gardens and parks that are protected at the federal level precisely as monuments of architecture and landscape art, despite the fact that these are primarily natural objects. I can give you a link to a document according to which this garden is completely protected. And according to the rules of the Russian part of the WLM, photographs of all objects that have a similar status can legally participate in the competition. I added the name of the garden to the description in English (in Russian it is already there) and the coordinates, but I really ask you not to tell me what can and cannot be uploaded to Russian WLM, because I have been among the organizers and members of the WLM jury several times and I know very well what is legal there and what is not. --Екатерина Борисова 03:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chennai Central Railway Station Building --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:05, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Green and purple CA on the roof and flagpole. --Tagooty 03:38, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 17, 2025

• 
  • Nomination Grand rally of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami. They organized this gathering at Suhrawardy Udyan in Dhaka and its surrounding areas to press for several demands, including proportional representation in elections. --Yahya 23:52, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose PC is needed, and people are motion blurred in the foreground at the bottom. --Sebring12Hrs 23:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pickup shoe of a Berlin S-Bahn train electrically arcing with the third rail, Berlin Ostkreuz station --Rail01 22:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dicke Tannen, stamp point 45 of the Harzer Wandernadel, at the Großer Wolfsbach near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View from Ebersberg to Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from ruined castle Drachenfels in Königswinter, Germany, on the Rhine --FlocciNivis 17:22, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Good picture, but several dust spots, some small and some larger. --Lmbuga 19:53, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Granite Setts - Red Square - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 16:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:54, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support As other sett-paved roads in Russia are sub-categorized by city, can you create and put this one (and others) into a sub-category for Moscow? --GRDN711 22:34, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    @GRDN711: Done! ~~~~ --Юрий Д.К. 08:36, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: View of the frozen Daugava river from Riga TV tower --MB-one 15:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lexus IS at Speed Drift Germany --MB-one 15:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment I think it's a good picture, but strong CAs. See, for example, the area near the top left corner. --Lmbuga 20:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:46, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cylindircal panarama of Tempelhofer Feld in Berlin --MB-one 15:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment It may still be QI, but it is too stright (or narrow); in fact, the image is cut off at the top and left sides. There is also some cropping at the bottom and right sides. --Lmbuga 20:17, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support A wonderful example of illustrating how to create a complex geometric fractal with incuded source code. This is a good QI and meets all the QI criteria --George Chernilevsky 15:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Comment Perhaps it could still be IQ, because these pictures of yours are good, but too tight; in fact, the image is somewhat cropped or cut off. --Lmbuga 20:22, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality.This is not a photo of a flower, but the result of mathematical calculations, so crop and composition are low applicable here. This is a good QI and meets all the QI criteria. --George Chernilevsky 15:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fragment of the Mandelbrot set Image --Aokoroko 13:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cable car from Koblenz to Fortress Ehrenbreitstein --Imehling 12:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Where is the focus? --Lvova 18:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Hi, do you think the cabins aren't sharp enough? If so I probably can't help it --Imehling 14:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Old rusty descent to New Ladoga Canal in Kobona village, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nuphar lutea in Kobona village, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Beatles inscription scratched on the wall of ruined Lutheran church in Malyje Gorki, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed

September 16, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Hamburg-Neugraben, Francoper Strasse 63, farmyard, side building --KaiBorgeest 20:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sukhoi Su-17 number 3305, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sukhoi Su-17 number 3305, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sukhoi Su-17 number 3305, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace annex in Trzebieszowice 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace annex in Trzebieszowice 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace annex in Trzebieszowice 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace annex in Trzebieszowice 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 17:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View up to the sky from the courtyard of the Bäckerstraße 7 in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Dust spots in the sky, otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Rock-cut Jain monuments of Gwalior (Urvai Group), Madhya Pradesh, India By User:ShiladityaM --Herpking 14:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Meliorstower in Büdingen, Hesse, Germany, seen from the southwest --Milseburg 14:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, but I would have adjusted WB a little bit cooler as there are no critical shadows might run into blue. --Syntaxys 15:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)  Info Thanks. WB is 1500K colder now. --Milseburg 14:34, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valeo CEO Christophe Périllat at IAA Summit 2025. By Mozamaniac --MB-one 10:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cvmontuy 10:33, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Presentation of the Mercedes-Benz eActros 600 by Karin Rådström at IAA Transportation 2024 in Hanover --MB-one 10:59, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Garden of Mariinsky Palace --Lvova 09:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 09:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lermontovski Prospekt 33 --Lvova 09:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Geese in Saint Petersburg --Lvova 09:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Streets of White town, Puducherry --I.Mahesh 08:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Wall arts on Puducherry beach road --I.Mahesh 08:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Copyright violation as there is no FOP for 2D graphic arts in India. --Tagooty 05:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Francolinus pictus (Painted Francolin) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints Cosmas and Damian --RealRome 07:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Nice, but CA on the cross. --Lvova 18:12, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Done thank you--RealRome 21:46, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Lvova 15:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Commercial building in Kuala Belait, Brunei in 2023 --Pangalau 06:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    perspective correction needed, also dark a bit --George Chernilevsky 14:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Istana Pantai, Tutong District of Brunei in 2022 --Pangalau 06:52, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Photograph of Chermin Island in 2022 --Pangalau 06:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Arctic tern (Sterna paradisaea) juvenile --Charlesjsharp 06:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The channel Bretterscher Graben in Erkner between Seestraße and Dämeritzsee --Kritzolina 06:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Boat on the channel Bretterscher Graben in Erkner between Seestraße and Dämeritzsee --Kritzolina 06:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Writing on the motor is blurry. --Tagooty 05:22, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rothenhof manor house in Trzebieszowice 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bolghar Mausoleum Ruins --Mike1979 Russia 05:56, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bolghar White Chamber --Mike1979 Russia 05:56, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Union Church, Ooty, stained glass skylight --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It seems motion blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 13:28, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

September 15, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Etoiles (Rayenne Guendil) lors du ZEVENT 2025 --Le Commissaire 19:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    noised. Fixable --George Chernilevsky 21:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Émilien, ancien maître de midi des 12 coups de midi, au ZEVENT 2025 --Le Commissaire 19:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    noised. Fixable --George Chernilevsky 21:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Jordan Rondelli (Joyca) lors du ZEVENT 2025 --Le Commissaire 19:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    noised. Fixable --George Chernilevsky 21:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pierre-Alexis Bizot - Domingo, lors du ZEVENT 2025. --Le Commissaire 19:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    noised. Fixable --George Chernilevsky 21:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Steinbach Waterfall below Neuer Teich near Zorge in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 17:55, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from the Reichsbrücke to the St. Francis of Assisi Church in Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Comment Please remove the dust spot (or blurred insect) in the top middle of the sky --Jakubhal 04:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A dry water basin in the Palm House in Schönbrunn, Vienna, Austria --FlocciNivis 16:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Outdoor gym in Astana --MB-one 15:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tajhat Jamidar Bari: A Majestic Glimpse into Bengal’s Zamindari Heritage.Tajhat Jamidar Bari is a historic and elegant zamindar palace located in Rangpur, Bangladesh, known for its stunning Indo-Saracenic architecture and current role as a museum.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This media has been uploaded as a part of Project Korikath --A S M Jobaer 15:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    perspective correction needed --George Chernilevsky 15:30, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Escalators and Stairs inside the ICC Berlin --Nylki 14:52, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose It seems blurred and PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Light sculpture by Frank Oehring, ICC Berlin --Nylki 14:45, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Is the picture legal? There's no Freedom of Panorama inside buildings in Germany. --Plozessor 03:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of Honda ZR-V e:HEV Z --TTTNIS 13:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2nd generation Daihatsu Mira e:S L --TTTNIS 13:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 2009 Mazda CX-7 --TTTNIS 13:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rear view of 7th generation Mazda Carol --TTTNIS 13:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Metro entrance lantern, Liberdade Avenue, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 11:07, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Musician and writer Kristopher Schau during a live recording of his book podcast at a literature event. --Birdesigns 09:40, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Historic enclosure of the Schwelgern Stadium in Duisburg-Marxloh --Carschten 08:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lada Vesta at Islam Karimov street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 07:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tesla Model Y at Islam Karimov street. Almaty, Kazakhstan. --Красный 07:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Cursorius coromandelicus (Indian Courser) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cursorius coromandelicus (Indian Courser) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bolghar White Chamber --Mike1979 Russia 05:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sukhoi Su-7 number 3508, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:51, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sukhoi Su-7 number 4242, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:51, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Serras gerais - Lavandeira -TO - By User:Ismael Carlos Oliveira de Paula --Rodrigo.Argenton 04:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Parque Nacional da Serra dos Orgãos By User:Allancarvlho --Rodrigo.Argenton 04:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fontanka Embankment, 17 --Lvova 03:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed at left. The "white" left building is leaning, to me. --Sebring12Hrs 23:18, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A balcony to the inner garden of the Mariinsky Palace --Lvova 03:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pair of sphinxes on the facade of listed building, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:11, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Relief on the facade of listed building, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed --Mike1979 Russia 06:17, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
    It's not a difficult task, but I can't do it right now. So let it go unassessed, I'll make PC later, and will nominate this photo again. --Екатерина Борисова 04:38, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tagetes erecta in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 08:10, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Cosmos in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed

September 14, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Small chapel in Giebing, Bernau am Chiemsee, Bavaria --Kritzolina 20:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Farm house in Giebing 25, Bernau am Chiemsee, Bavaria --Kritzolina 20:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Clearly leaning at left. --Sebring12Hrs 16:22, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
    Not so clearly, I don't see it. --Lvova 17:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Look at the door. Too much leaning to me. --Sebring12Hrs 23:16, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Got it. A good hint for the author about fixing, thank you. --Lvova 11:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Xiaopeng He at IAA Summit 2025 in Munich --MB-one 20:05, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sukhoi Su-7 number 116, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sukhoi Su-7 number 116, Polish Aviation Museum, 39 Jana Pawła II Avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moscow - 2025 - GUM --Юрий Д.К. 10:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tenement house of the Brotherly-Loving Society - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 10:04, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chalon-sur-Saône (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Town Hall square, with Saint Peter church on the right --Benjism89 08:23, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Palace of Schönbrunn in Vienna, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:15, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Not very sharp at full size and a bit noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 13:12, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
    The photo was taken off-center, with the faces of people in a public place crudely blurred out in the worst Google panorama tradition. --Lvova 17:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment I think Lvova comment was for these picture, not the other one. --Sebring12Hrs 23:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Was it not here? Oops. Yes, it should be there. --Lvova 11:41, 18 September 2025 (UTC) upd Something is with the script - it put my comment into the wrong place again; now I edited manually. Lvova 11:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 13, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Man is hanging the elections placate to the construction site fence at 30, Rustaveli Avenue. Tbilisi, Georgia. --Красный 17:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View to the Schloss Drachenburg in Königswinter, Germany --FlocciNivis 08:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Coturnix coromandelica (Rain Quail) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:35, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    I'm not ready to support the quality (probably someone else will), but want to left like for the plot. --Lvova 17:57, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tenement house, 1930 design. Stanisław Piwowarczyk, 5 Krasińskiego avenue, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:47, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment We can see all details of the buildings, but there are purple CAs on the roof, color noise everywhere in the darker areas, and the clouds are a bit blown-out. A bit too much everythings to me. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 12:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Adam Mickiewicz Avenue, (view to N), Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 07:47, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bolghar Mausoleum of Khans --Mike1979 Russia 07:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Outbuldding in Orłowiec 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too dark with CA's on trees, fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)@Екатерина Борисова:  Done--Jacek Halicki 07:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    Looks better, but CA's are still here. --Екатерина Борисова 04:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Outbuldding in Orłowiec 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:03, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too dark with CA's on trees, fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)@Екатерина Борисова:  Done--Jacek Halicki 07:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
    Looks better, but CA's are still here. --Екатерина Борисова 04:20, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Narayan Darwaza, Lohagad Fort --Rangan Datta Wiki 04:28, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment A lot of chromatic aberration that should be fixed --Jakubhal 04:32, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not fixed --Jakubhal 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bastions of Lohagad Fort --Rangan Datta Wiki 04:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    There is a lot of chromatic aberration on the left --Jakubhal 04:34, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Not fixed --Jakubhal 05:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Fountain on Cathedral Square, Staraya Russa, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Balcony in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 02:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:15, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chehova 18 --Lvova 00:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The building itself looks good, but blown out clouds with half-worn wires spoil the image. --Екатерина Борисова 02:47, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chehova 18 --Lvova 00:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC needed --Mike1979 Russia 16:00, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

September 12, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: O3 Business Campus, Opolska Street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 00:06, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Interior of Neermahal, Tripura. By User:Bodhisattwa --Herpking 16:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)  Comment There are strong CAs at the doors of the building --Imehling 07:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Neermahal, Tripra, India. --Herpking 16:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)  Comment Tilted cw --Imehling 14:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bicycle repair station by Topeak --MB-one 15:44, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Church of the Theotokos of the Sign in Dubrovitsy, Moscow region --Никонико962 08:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The top is blurry - probably after PC. --Lvova 17:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Manor in Orłowiec --Jacek Halicki 07:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Strong blue CAs on the chimney and at the top of the trees. --Sebring12Hrs 10:14, 12 September 2025 (UTC)@Sebring12Hrs:  Done--Jacek Halicki 07:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lantana. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 05:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aerial image of Bonifacio (view from the southwest) --Carsten Steger 05:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Too bright IMO --Ermell 05:49, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Thank you very much for the review! I have uploaded a new version of the image that is slightly darker. --Carsten Steger 09:04, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    Could do with more highlight reduction. Look at the rocks at the very right side. --Ermell 20:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment Thank you very much for your additional feedback. I have uploaded a new version in which I have reduced the brightness in this area. --Carsten Steger 08:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Parque Estadual do Tainhas de nível Estadual, By User:MartinKlippel --Rodrigo.Argenton 05:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Please add the species of the frog to the description and the categories. --Carsten Steger 05:20, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Papilio agenor Linnaeus, 1758 - Great MormonT. By User:Subhendukhan --Atudu 04:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    No thematic categories, blurry. --Lvova 00:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zhukovskogo 20 --Lvova 04:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 06:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    I tried to nominate those which don't need correction imho; cannot fix it in the nearest future anyway. --Lvova 21:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zhukovskogo 10 --Lvova 04:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 06:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    I tried to nominate those which don't need correction imho; cannot fix it in the nearest future anyway. --Lvova 21:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Vosstaniya 33 --Lvova 04:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 06:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    I tried to nominate those which don't need correction imho; cannot fix it in the nearest future anyway. --Lvova 21:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Balcony in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:53, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:09, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 11, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Cultural heritage monument Lessingstr. 8 in Leipzig-Zentrum-West --Mosbatho 19:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Too distorted. Verticals are not vertical. --Sebring12Hrs 20:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    Hi Sebring! It's simply impossible to take a picture that can be perfect in every correct lining out from a really narrow alleyway (as it is with this "street"). That's difficult to photograph without losing too much detail of the listed building, think of details atop etc --Mosbatho 21:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    Same feel bro, but it is a reason not to nominate. --Lvova 09:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lajkonik fete 2025, Rodła boulevard, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 14:23, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Color banding and artifacts in the sky. Shouldn't happen with that camera at ISO 100, probably too strong JPG compression in an intermediate step? --Plozessor 03:35, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Market Square in Kietrz (Katscher), Poland --Pudelek 12:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice, coordinates would be fine and the resolution is rather small regarding the camera used. Do you have a larger version? --Milseburg 15:45, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment No, only this version --Pudelek 12:59, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose Given the composition, I have strong suspicion, that the image has been downsampled (not necessarily on purpose). If that's not the case, I would like to have a good expanation, why the image hase been cropped in more than 60 % areawise from the sensor's native resolution --MB-one 15:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Zhukovskogo Street 7-9 --Lvova 07:04, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 08:47, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    I tried to nominate those which don't need correction imho; cannot fix it in the nearest future anyway. --Lvova 21:36, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Park in Ołdrzychowice Kłodzkie 3 --Jacek Halicki 06:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline "I’m sorry, the composition doesn’t work for me --Cvmontuy 00:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
     Comment No issue with composition, but PC is needed. And may be some areas are a bit overexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 06:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Main Grill and Ale House, Kingsville, Ontario, 2025-06-29 --Crisco 1492 01:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit noisy and not fully sharp. Was there a reason for f/9, ISO 800 and 1/1250s in bright daylight? --Plozessor 02:54, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    Simply put, I forgot to reset the ISO after taking an interior picture. I had thought the quality sufficed still; the camera handles ISO 800 much better than my previous kit. --Crisco 1492 10:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

September 10, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Lajkonik fete 2025, Vistula river, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
     Oppose I like your photos, and this plot is interesting, but the focus is on the hand on the foreground. --Lvova 17:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Lvova: and now? --Igor123121 20:09, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Now you cropped the focused part :) But ok, let's wait for more opinions. --Lvova 20:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lajkonik fete 2025, Church of St. Augustine and St. John the Baptist, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 05:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Again, the focus and the composition, sorry. But I made a comment, maybe a derivative work might be QI (but will not show the event, yes). --Lvova 17:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

September 9, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Stolpen Castle: View from the Siebenspitzenturm onto the castle courtyard with Seigerturm and Coselturm --Romzig 21:15, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    A bit too soft. --Lvova 17:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
    Thanks for the reviews. I've uploaded a new version. --Romzig 17:49, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ford at IAA 2025 --Alexander-93 21:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. The building is leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 04:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Belltower of Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery in Suzdal --Vsatinet 20:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The face is striked, the sky is too bright and a little bit noisy; not sure if it's fixable. --Lvova 17:28, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Parterre of the National Botanical Garden of Georgia in Tbilisi, Georgia. --Phyrexian 19:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    The sky is a bit grainy. Otherwise very good --MB-one 18:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

September 7, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Karaoke box for the audience at Tons of Rock open air festival --Birdesigns 00:07, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Nice image but uncategorized --MB-one 17:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

September 4, 2025

• 
  • Nomination The main entrance of Ujjayanta Palace, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 08:54, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 20:27, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done +description and/or caption is missing on the file page. Can be re-nominated after fixing --MB-one 15:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 3, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Presentation church (under restoration) and belltower in Rizopolozhensky Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 20:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
    This is a tricky question. All the lines that should be vertical are vertical on the image. There are some minor distortions in other directions, but these are more likely to be PC errors than perspective distortions per se. Okay, let's try this. --Vsatinet 18:17, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    The brick building is leaning. The tower is good. --Sebring12Hrs 23:06, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stair in belltower at Rizopolozhensky Monastery (Suzdal) --Vsatinet 20:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Very noisy --MB-one 10:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done can be re-nominated after fixing --MB-one 15:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salem Junction Railway station view from the train. --Gnoeee 11:12, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Good but tilted CCW --MB-one 10:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
     Oppose  Not done can be re-nominated after fixing --MB-one 15:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Marktkirche Wiesbaden at golden hour --MB-one 07:35, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    Very strong PC. --Sebring12Hrs 07:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
     Question What do you mean? The vertical lines are nearly perfect. --MB-one 08:11, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
    Judging by the category, every photographer strives to straighten this unfortunate church as much as possible, so it's completely unclear what it really looks like. --Екатерина Борисова 00:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
    @Екатерина Борисова: There is an uncorrected version here that looks just as weird: Wiesbaden_Marktkirche_2012-07-04-21-34-09.jpg --Syntaxys 04:09, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
    The left tower seems to be slightly curved outward. I downloaded the photo to check it in a photo editor. Yes, the top of the tower is slightly tilted, although the bottom is strictly vertical. But visually it gives a very noticeable effect, because when looking at a tall structure from below, the real perspective looks different. --Vsatinet 12:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
    Details in the picture are uneven, especially on the top. --Lvova 17:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

September 1, 2025

• 
  • Nomination: Suzdal, Saints Boris and Gleb Church --Vsatinet 20:55, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Review
    There is a big dust spot on the left tower. --Heylenny 05:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
     Done Thank you, fixed --Vsatinet 17:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
    There are still artifacts or dust sports at the top. --Sebring12Hrs 11:25, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    Oops... My eyes weren't strong enough to see these spots. ОК.  Done I tried to find and remove them. --Vsatinet 18:33, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
    imho it's an unlucky example of PC: the tower is soft and falling down --Lvova 17:34, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Улица_Авроры,_Ломоносов_02.jpg

• Nomination Aurora street --Lvova 10:36, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment I don't dare reject (or decline) it because I haven't seen many photos rejected for composition since I returned to QIC. The picture is fine, but I don't think the composition is appropriate: a small strip of the lower area could be omitted and the tree in the upper area could be shown in its entirety. upd.  Oppose For the reasons stated above. Now I think it is better to decline it because that way you can send it for discussion. --Lmbuga 13:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  Okay, let's discuss. For me it's questionable why to cut off the lower part if the subject is the street, and it is the street. But yes, I can do nothing with the tree already. --Lvova 14:21, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment The strip of dust road at the bottom is fine with me, given the subject of this picture. But yes, not an optimal crop at the top. And it would be better with PC --Benjism89 18:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  What's wrong with perspective?.. Lvova 21:30, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Neutral The photo is sharp, the colors are good, but the description "Ulitsa Avrory" (Aurora Street) is too short. What is the photo supposed to show? Is it the garden fence or the unpaved road surface? The tree shouldn't be cut off at the top, and the perspective on the left could be adjusted a bit. For me, the photo is neither good nor bad. -- Spurzem 06:26, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

  What is the photo supposed to show? - the street. The photo is done and used in the article about the street. That's how this city (yep) street looks like. Lvova 10:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 10:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Juvenile_American_Flamingo_resting_on_the_beach.jpg

• Nomination juvenile American Flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber) resting on the beach of Floreana Island, Galápagos --E bailey 14:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality, but please, add location category. --Lvova 22:32, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  Added location category. --E bailey 00:04, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose No good composition, and the depth of field seems too small to me, but above all the back and the wing of the bird are a bit overexposed. -- Spurzem 06:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 10:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Центральная_улица,_Ломоносов_01.jpg

• Nomination Tsentralnaya ('the center') street --Lvova 10:55, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Oppose Sorry, the object peeking out on the right side of the picture could have been avoided. The tree could appear whole because it would not detract from the lower part of the photo (IMO). The blue object is distracting. --Lmbuga 13:59, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  Not a big deal, but let's discuss why gates should be avoided and blue object has no right to be on the picture if it is on the street. --Lvova 14:26, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't understand the point of the composition. In front we have a lot of dirt road and in the middle a trimmed tree. -- Spurzem 06:54, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Успенский_сквер._Цинния_01.jpg

• Nomination Zinnia in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 03:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• The location should be included in the image description but this image is of an unidentified red rose in a garden, not a cultural heritage object. --GRDN711 18:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

  first of all it's not a rose. Also I have devoted more than ten years to studying the cultural heritage sites of Saint Petersburg and I know by heart the numbers of documents according to which one object ot another is under state protection. We have many gardens and parks that are protected at the federal level precisely as monuments of architecture and landscape art, despite the fact that these are primarily natural objects. I can give you a link to a document according to which this garden is completely protected. And according to the rules of the Russian part of the WLM, photographs of all objects that have a similar status can legally participate in the competition. I added the name of the garden to the description in English (in Russian it is already there) and the coordinates, but I really ask you not to tell me what can and cannot be uploaded to Russian WLM, because I have been among the organizers and members of the WLM jury several times and I know very well what is legal there and what is not. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:35, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

   Oppose Thank you for catching the correct flower ID. You are right - it is a zinnia, not a rose. I find the image presented to be QI acceptable. Reluctantly, I remain opposed based on the categorization of this image as being an integral part of a cultural monument. If the image was a wider view of the Uspensky Garden, you might have a case. However, the nominated image is a bloom close-up of a flower species that could be anywhere, or if the garden was replanted with a different species, may not be there next year. I will let you take up the argument further with others in consensus. --GRDN711 22:19, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  OK. I want to say two thuings. 1. I have been participating in Russian WLM since 2012 as a photographer and, as I said, I have been among the organizers and jury members several times. In all these years, no one has ever told me or other photographers that if a garden or park is a cultural heritage cite, then it must be photographed in its entirety, and its individual plants cannot be uploaded to the competition. You are the first in 13 years. At the same time, as far as I understand, you do not know which objects and exactly how they are protected in our country. If for some reason something in Russian WLM rules bothers you, ask the organizers a question. It's not clear why you're trying to discuss these rules here. 2. There is not a single word about any contests in the rules of the QI project. Simply put, it's not our business at all to figure out whether someone's photo meets the rules of a competition or not, photos are evaluated here according to completely different criteria. So again, I don't understand why you're trying to evaluate photos based on criteria that have nothing to do with QI project. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:17, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Comment I will wait for other opinions, but it's not the only GRDN711's argument that has nothing commmon with QI rules; also I saw too many similar images, for example. Hope they will start to participate here in the border of rules without repeating the same mistakes. Lvova 10:31, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 10:31, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Набережная_канала_Грибоедова,_39,_СПб_01.jpg

• Nomination Griboedov Canal Embankment 39 --Lvova 03:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
   Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 04:12, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry but slight PC is needed at left. --Sebring12Hrs 09:06, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Moscow_-_2025_-_Sofiyskaya_Embankment_-_British_Embassy.jpg

• Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Sofiyskaya Embankment - British Embassy --Юрий Д.К. 13:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• CA on the top right --Mike1979 Russia 13:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• CA really minimal; it gets my  Support --Mosbatho 16:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Done. CA is minimal but I've decided to reduce it. Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Thank you.--Mike1979 Russia (talk) 11:37, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 15:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Успенский_сквер._Шиповник_03.jpg

• Nomination Rosa rugosa in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 03:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:38, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. With small splotches at petal edges, specimen is not the best. Unidentified rose is deep pink, not red. Also, image appears soft at f/3.3 and exposure time of 1/200 9need faster shutter speed or use a tripod). You can certainly mention the location in the image description, but this rose as main subject, is a rose in a garden, is not a cultural heritage object. --GRDN711 17:59, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

  Firstly, it is not a rose, but a rosehip, secondly, it is not written anywhere in the description that it is red, thirdly, there are no categories for rosehip flowers by color. You can create them if you wish. I added the name of the garden to the description in English (in Russian it is already there) and the coordinates. Perhaps this is not the most successful shot of a rosehip flower, and I will not be offended if it is not considered good enough to be QI. However, I will be extremely happy if no one tells me what I can upload to Russian WLM and what I can't. All explanations are in the nearby comment. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:42, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

  "This image has not quality because it is pink, not red, and it is a part, not the whole garden" - what's the nonsense? Lvova 14:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 14:16, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Indian_national_flag_flies_next_to_the_Clock_Tower_of_Chennai_Central_Station.jpg

• Nomination Indian national flag flies next to the Clock Tower of Chennai Central Station --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:31, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition is interesting, but both objects are not sharp IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 03:56, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

• In my opinion, the sharpness is perfectly adequate at this resolution. --XRay 10:43, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose I agree that it lacks of focus. Lvova 15:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp and also a minor tilt --Jakubhal 04:02, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 15:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Plan_général_de_l'exposition_coloniale_de_Marseille_(1922).jpg

• Nomination Français : Plan général de l'Exposition coloniale de Marseille (1922) --Lucas Longour 13:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose I don't think this qualifies as "taken by a Commons user". --Plozessor 16:55, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

• Why ? I took the photo of the original by myself, edit and crop before the import --Lucas Longour 05:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

• If you 'took the photo of the original by yourself' then it may qualify, but the description is wrong. It has a license tag that says "this tag applies to scans and photocopies only", it does not mention you as a photographer at all, and the categories clearly indicate that this would be a scan, not a photograph. If you fix the description (probably using the "Art photo" template) and categorization, it might be ok. --Plozessor 03:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Info Sending this to CR. Please do not revert to "/Nomination" once there is a vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Lvova 15:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_вокзал,_фонарь_на_платформе.jpg

• Nomination Damaged lamp post of New Peterhof railway station, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 01:28, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Mmmhh not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 04:05, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Sharpness is OK IMO --MB-one 15:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose After another look, I think it should be discussed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I think, we should not overdo. -- Spurzem 20:48, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support. Picture sufficiently sharp. DoF could be slightly better, but also sufficient. IMO--Lmbuga 23:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per others, good enough Jakubhal 04:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Lvova 15:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Bolghar_Assumption_Church_2024-07-12_1076.jpg

• Nomination Bolghar Assumption Church --Mike1979 Russia 05:41, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 09:44, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• Tilted --Uoaei1 09:46, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Correction needed --Uoaei1 09:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Fixed. Thank you --Mike1979 Russia 16:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The bottom crop is a bit too tight, but the overall quality is still good IMO. -- Екатерина Борисова 04:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:56, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Spichrz_w_Trzebieszowicach_(4).jpg

• Nomination Granary in Trzebieszowice 1 by User:Jacek Halicki Boston9 19:18, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The left part of this ruin is blown out while the right part is too dark in shadows. Also right side is not sharp enough. Maybe fixable. --Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

File:2024_Spichrz_w_Trzebieszowicach_(5).jpg

• Nomination Granary in Trzebieszowice 2 by User:Jacek Halicki Boston9 19:18, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:08, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The left part of this ruin is blown out while the right part is too dark in shadows. Also right side is not sharp enough. Maybe fixable. --Екатерина Борисова 03:57, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Peulle 07:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Drummuir_&_Botriphnie_Community_Hall.jpg

• Nomination The Drummuir & Botriphnie Community Hall was built in 1900 to funds from the mother-in-law of the then Laird of Drummuir, and it was extended in 2011. --TheBritinator 12:29, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Left side leaning in and an additional category about the building (what is it, or even what is it made from?) is nedded --Poco a poco 16:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

• I have rotated the image slightly. Hope this helps. --TheBritinator 19:35, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

• Dust spot at the upper right corner and a bit tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 12:11, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

• And don't forget to add categories --Poco a poco 14:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 13:08, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The dust spot should be removed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:39, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose till cats are added --Poco a poco 16:40, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Peulle 07:59, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Hauptplatz_19_in_Enns_(2).jpg

• Nomination Old town hall at Hauptplatz 19 in Enns, Upper Austria, Austria. --Tournasol7 06:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose The building is too shadowed, and it leans to the left. Perhaps both of these things can be improved. But at the moment, it's not a quality image for me. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 06:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see significant perspective problems, but must agree to spurzem: probably two or three hours later the lighting would have been much better. --Smial 15:32, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Smial - building in shadow with sunlit surroundings/background is difficult. --Plozessor 03:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Pulkau_Heilig-Blut-Kirche_Flügelaltar_Madonna_01.jpg

• Nomination Madonna and Child at the winged altar of the Church of the Holy Blood in Pulkau, Lower Austria. Hans Schlais, around 1515. --Uoaei1 05:12, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 05:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Weak support  Oppose The statue is too dark. The window in the background is a problem, of course. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 06:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC) – The improved version is better now. -- Spurzem 17:59, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Info @Spurzem: New version with increased brightness available --Uoaei1 10:03, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Still somewhat soft, but the rework is good enough regarding the difficult lighting situation. --Smial 12:47, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:33, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Die_Josef_auf_dem_Chiemsee_02.jpg

• Nomination The Josef leaving the harbour of Prien-Stock on lake Chiemsee, Bavaria --Kritzolina 07:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Image seems dark with murky tones. Ship is not well shown. --GRDN711 16:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Probably white balance is not optimal as the ship's bow seems slightly blueish. Still over the bar IMO. --Plozessor 03:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Die_Josef_auf_dem_Chiemsee_03.jpg

• Nomination The Josef leaving the harbour of Prien-Stock on lake Chiemsee, Bavaria --Kritzolina 07:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Image seems dark and ship is not well shown. --GRDN711 16:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose While the composition could be fixed with some bottom cropping, I don't think the image is sharp enough.--Peulle 08:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Lohagad_Fort_Tomb_6.jpg

• Nomination Tomb atop Lohagad Fort --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:46, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 15:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Weak sharpness --Jakubhal 15:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support IMO not perferct, but sharp enough. --Plozessor 03:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough, and shadows are too harsh. -- Екатерина Борисова 03:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:51, 18 September 2025 (UTC))

File:2024-09-11_01_Wide_view_of_Port_Angeles,_Washington_USA.jpg

• Nomination View of the city and harbor of Port Angeles, Washington USA from the north. --GRDN711 22:55, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:10, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Especially the right part is tilted ccw. --Milseburg 13:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

• Thank you Milseburg for you review and comment. Made ccw til correction. --GRDN711 16:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

• Alignment is better now. And the pano is larger now. Please check the white ship on the left. It seems there are some CAs on the railing to remove. --Milseburg 14:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  
•  Comment Thanks. Did not see the CAs until you pointed them out. Have made a correction. See if this helps. --GRDN711 06:05, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Support I think it's QI now. --Milseburg 21:10, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:29, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Rosa_-_Park_of_the_Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour_-_Moscow_-_2025-8_7.jpg

• Nomination Dying Rosa - Park of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour --Юрий Д.К. 22:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:34, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Being another image oif an unidentified rose cultivar among the 194 in the Wilted Rose category, even if it is technically acceptable, is not enough. There must be a belief that this image is publishable in Wikimedia projects or outside use per COM:QIC guidelines on Value. Sorry, but I don't see that in this image. --GRDN711 16:49, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

• QI project is about quality, not about value as far as I understand. It doesn't really matters how many pictures of red roses, grey sparrows or yellow houses got QI status. I personally don't see a single word in QI rules about the maximum allowed amount of images of one object or another. Maybe I miss something, so let's discuss. --Екатерина Борисова 04:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

 Comment It's not about the number of images in a category nor how many are rated as QI. The issue here is that this image has been nominated for distinction as a Quality Image over many similar others in the same category. The first QI criteria per COM:QIC guidelines on Value is that the image must have the potential for publication in Wikimedia and other Wikis. When I look at your image, I see an ordinary image of an unidentified red rose taken under the harsh mid-day sun. What distinguishes this image for use for publication in Wikimedia and other Wikis? --GRDN711 05:51, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Support The QIC guidelines do not state that images "must have the potential for publication in Wikimedia and other Wikis", they state that "our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects" [1]. The other projects bit is important, as it refers to one of Wiki Commons' key aims: to make "available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all " [2]. I can think of a myriad reasons why end-users may find educational value on quality images of unidentified rosa cultivars. To name just one: say that I'm a researcher developing an algorithm to identify species of roses. Having a subset of images that have been vetted for technical image quality and proper categorisation would be of tremendous value --Julesvernex2 07:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  

•  Comment One can always make up a hypothetical use, but an equal or higher probability case could be made that this image will be collecting digital dust in 50 years, with no found use whatsoever.

With this QI nomination, the nominator is asking that this image be rated with the distinction of a Quality Image rating making it better (?) than the other 193 wilted rose images, or the 3,697 red roses with an unidentified genus? If there was something about it that stood out beyond the ordinary, I would be OK with it. I am opposed because it does not appear to me to have sufficient QI value to have a meaningful future in the Wiki world. --GRDN711 06:56, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Whether or not an image receives QI status often depends greatly on the mood and expertise of the viewer. For example, this image of mine was rejected because it is not consistently sharp, which is hardly to be expected in a close-up, even though it is correctly categorised and in my opinion very useful for wiki* projects. This image here lacks sufficient categorisation, is not well executed technically, not consistently sharp, and the image composition is not well designed. In any other photo competition, this image would be rated as a ‘nice try’. Sorry. --Syntaxys 07:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. It should not be unique and don't depend on Syntaxys's nominations. Lvova 09:38, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
  • It seems that you have a problem with me and my nominations if you apply different standards. It may be that I am sometimes very direct and strict in my assessments. But I evaluate the images, not the photographers, and I do so in the interest of optimising quality for Commons. What is the point of all these QI rules if images with really serious errors are often waved through on the basis of nepotism, while other truly breathtaking images are rejected because of the smallest of errors? I am not referring to my own work, but to that of other photographers who no longer wish to nominate their work for precisely this reason. This is regrettable, annoying for the photographers concerned and certainly not beneficial for Commons. --Syntaxys 10:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
    • I have problems with you just since I see such messages. You cite your unsharp nomination as an argument for a nomination that has no problem with focus, and then you make unfounded accusations of nepotism - and that's a problem. Lvova 11:05, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
      • In my opinion, this photo also has a focus problem, otherwise I would not have criticised it. And my complaint about nepotism is based on the fact that I noticed some nominations that were waved through regardless of their quality. If I am wrong about this, I regret it and take it back. But I would also be interested to know how other users feel about this. --Syntaxys 11:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
        • In my opinion, this photo also has a focus problem - so you're opposed, and I don't strike your voice. It's easy to check how often do I support one user or another, easy to check how often my reviews go to this section. The image can be valued, but not QI, so when your works are denied here it means nothing about their usefulness. Lvova 11:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
        • Okay, I'm really not looking for a fight, especially not over a photo and even less so over a QI status that wasn't granted. Really, that's not me. We all spend our time here trying to make the world a better place, and it's important to recognize that. I noticed a few things I wanted to address because I want to understand them. This image now has 4:2 supporters, so for me it's a good image. Thank you. Syntaxys 11:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support it's technically a very good photograph and IMO it's sufficiently categorized. You can't reasonably expect every Commons user to correctly identify the species of a rose flower. The genus should be good enough here. --MB-one 11:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per MB-one. However, I strongly disagree with the suggestion that quality images candidates should be just evaluated for technical quality. There are other requirements, such as Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Image_page_requirements and Commons:Quality_images_candidates#Value. So if this were a misidentified specimen or a plant of which even the genus is unknown, I would oppose it. Generally, the genus should be known for organisms at the very least. For a rose cultivar in a public location, it is generally difficult to find out the exact name of the cultivar. Speculative assignments are too risky. So the ID is acceptable IMO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Somewhat low DOF, very harsh lighting. Furthermore, I don't see the point of the precisely centered composition and the rather small size of the main motif. --Smial 13:02, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:30, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Rosa_-_Park_of_the_Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour_-_Moscow_-_2025-8_13.jpg

• Nomination Rosa - Park of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour --Юрий Д.К. 22:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Lvova 21:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. This image is one of 3,697 images in Category:Unidentified red Rosa cultivars and lacks distinction per COM:QIC guidelines on Value. Sorry, IMHO, while technically acceptable, another unidentified rose imaget is not QI. --GRDN711 17:06, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per reasoning on previous nomination --Julesvernex2 07:03, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Comment The lighting is not very conducive, but with a different crop, the image could be rescued from its dullness, see note I've left. --Syntaxys 08:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:30, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Rosa_-_Park_of_the_Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour_-_Moscow_-_2025-8_15.jpg

• Nomination Rosa - Park of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour --Юрий Д.К. 22:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:16, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I disagree. As one of 1,332 unidentified yellow Rosa cultivars, this image lacks distinction per COM:QIC guidelines on Value. --GRDN711 17:16, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Per reasoning on previous nomination --Julesvernex2 07:04, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Lvova 09:39, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Harlock81 05:28, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Catherine_Hutchesson_at_the_Malaysia_Club_of_South_Australia's_Pasar_Malam_event_-_07.jpg

• Nomination Catherine Hutchesson at the Malaysia Club of South Australia's Pasar Malam event. --Pangalau 05:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Why ISO 6400? Very poor processing. Lot of jpeg artefacts, noised, not sharp enough. --George Chernilevsky 19:25, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per George Chernilevsky. It's an outdoor shot, so the light should be good enough for a better image.--Peulle 08:45, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
• It's certainly not the best image, but it's good enough. However, to be honest, I don't see the many JPEG artifacts and the sharpness is sufficient. ISO 6400 may not be ideal, but I don't know the reasons for this choice. --XRay 10:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:26, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Robert_Simms_MLC_at_the_Young_Greens_and_Uni_Club_Greens_Parliament_House_Tour_-_02.jpg

• Nomination Robert Simms MLC at the Young Greens and Uni Club Greens Parliament House Tour. --Pangalau 05:28, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Why ISO 6400? Very poor processing. Lot of jpeg artefacts, noised, not sharp enough. --George Chernilevsky 19:26, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose per George Chernilevsky.--Peulle 08:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:26, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Wall_detail,_Arroios_Market,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg

• Nomination Wall detail, Arroios Market, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 06:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too soft and too dark IMO --MB-one 18:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

• The image is neither soft (good focus, adequate depth of field, sufficient detail) nor dark (the main subject - the sliver of light across the wall - pops out but its surroundings are still clearly visible) --Julesvernex2 18:58, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Oppose Am neutal on User:MB-one's issue of sharpness. It is about as sharp as an image taken wiht a normal lens at a 1/570th @ F/6.3 can be, which means it is not crispy. The bigger issue I have is that this image lacks distinction per COM:QIC guidelines on Value. What is the intention-for-use in Wikimedia and the other Wikis? While the image is categorized under an indoor market, it does not illustrate that. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

• As I noted on a nomination above where you used the same reasoning, Wiki Commons is not limited to Wiki use: the scope of the project is to serve all end-users looking for freely-licenced content [3]. There are plenty of ways this image could be used in accordance to Wiki Commons' definition of educational value (as "providing knowledge; instructional or informative") e.g.: as architectural documentation (documenting the geometry, wall finishes, and window colours of the Arroios Market and modernist design), as a visual record of urban heritage and conservation, for lighting and design studies (e.g., to demonstrate how natural light interacts with interior surfaces), or to illustrate abstraction in photography. I've added categories related to these uses. --Julesvernex2 (talk)

•  Comment Julesvernex2 I think you are pushing the limit in proposing that this image has educational value in "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". To me, this remains a personal picture of some artistic merit that will likely find no further Wiki or other end-use.
  

You list many possible hypothetical uses, but the only image description is barest “Wall detail, Arroios Market, Lisbon, Portugal”. Suggest you at least add your idea list of possible uses cases in the image description along with any other relevant detail, so that if someone stumbles onto this image, they might have a better idea of what it is and how it might be used.

Wikipedia is at its core mission, an online encyclopedia, and uploaded images need to be chosen to support that purpose. Just being technically acceptable is not enough. This is why COM:QIC guidelines list Value is the first criteria for adding the distinction of a QI rating to any uploaded image. --GRDN711 17:03, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Gordon, I'll summarise here the reservations I have with your reasoning on this review and the others above (purely because I find the topic interesting, I'm neutral on the final outcomes of the reviews): i) Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, Wiki Commons is an image repository; QI belongs to the latter, not the former; ii) Wiki Commons' broad definition of value is a feature, not a bug: the end-user's reasons for reuse are aplenty and often completely different from the photographer or uploader's intentions (recently I came across this image used to illustrate a beef between a quantum physicist and Lenin [4], which was definitely not on my mind when I took the shot); and iii) the QI status is a pass/fail test, not a ranking: images are judged purely against the QI guidelines, and neither the nominator nor the reviewer are expected to compare it with other images in the same categories (which would be a dauting task for most images). There is a lot that could be improved in the current QI process (e.g., an AI based tool that identifies the best images in each category would be awesome), but until then we should follow the existing rules when evaluating candidates. --Julesvernex2 16:24, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

•  Support Per Julesvernex2--Lmbuga 20:37, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Snow_plough_simulator,_IAA_Open_Space_2025,_Ludwigstrasse,_Munich_(20250909-P1050567).jpg

• Nomination Snow plough simulator of the Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wohnen, Bau und Verkehr at IAA Mobility 2025 in Munich --MB-one 16:37, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Should get cropped in order to focus on the main subject and maybe some rotation neccessary. --Mosbatho 18:40, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
  •  Done cropped the top. Checked the perspective: no rotation necessary IMO. Thank you for your review and suggestions. --MB-one 06:08, 12 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support acceptable. --Smial 12:29, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Seems okay to me.--Peulle 08:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree that cropping would help. Also the image overall seems dark and murky. Some tonal tweaking would improve it. --GRDN711 15:13, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
  •  Done cropped even closer, raised the exposure and the shadows. Also refindes the coordinates. Thanks for the review. --MB-one 08:48, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Lvova 15:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Lohagad_Fort_Narayan_Darwaza_2.jpg

• Nomination Narayan Darwaza, Lohagad Fort --Rangan Datta Wiki 02:43, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 04:41, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are some chromatic aberration on the wall on the left --Jakubhal 06:49, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose Indeed there are. I'm also not sure about the perspective.--Peulle 08:49, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA (also on the right side ;-) ). I would not demand a perspective correction from this camera location, but a slight(!) clockwise rotation would probably help. --Smial 13:13, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Harlock81 05:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

• Fri 12 Sep → Sat 20 Sep
• Sat 13 Sep → Sun 21 Sep
• Sun 14 Sep → Mon 22 Sep
• Mon 15 Sep → Tue 23 Sep
• Tue 16 Sep → Wed 24 Sep
• Wed 17 Sep → Thu 25 Sep
• Thu 18 Sep → Fri 26 Sep
• Fri 19 Sep → Sat 27 Sep
• Sat 20 Sep → Sun 28 Sep