Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2024

File:Llao Llao Peninsula.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2024 at 18:11:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
Info All by me -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see too much of a bluish tint in the photo. Otherwise it's a great shot. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando, could you check whether shifting the white balance a bit more towards warm/yellowish improves the photo, as Draceane suggests? This could make your beautiful shot even better. – Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input @Aristeas, @Basile Morin, @Draceane. I uploaded a new one with a slight warmer tone. Fernando (talk) 14:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem probably comes more from your chosen color profile ProPhoto RGB, see this nomination with similar color problem, that has been fixed by converting the format into sRGB. See also this case -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I didn't know about this! I reuploaded with the different colour profile. Fernando (talk) 09:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for editing. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Argentina

File:Cheops Mountain seen the Sir Donald Trail.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:33:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
Info: Cheops Mountain seen from the Sir Donald Trail, Glacier National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very pretty Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 01:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop too tight at the bottom, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 08:12, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful winter scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia

File:Вид на Мурманск с горы Горелой.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:49:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: view of Murmansk from the Gorelaya Mountain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia

File:Black-capped chickadee (41417).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 15:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Paridae (Tits)
Info Diminutive black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) hanging on a plant, feasting on some seeds. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming, educational, excellent quality --Kritzolina (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 21:16, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great stuff Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Paridae (Tits)

File:Po dešti ve Středohoří.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 19:03:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Czech Republic#Ústí nad Labem (no photos of this region yet)
Info created by Crutch1973 – uploaded by Crutch1973 – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Crutch1973 and Draceane: A stunning drone capture, in my opinion a great landscape scene. The technical quality is a bit too noisy for my taste. Hence my suggestion of an improvement via a SwissTransfer link. Feel free to use it for an update if you like the edit. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the technical quality is okay but the colours seem a bit weird to me Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the inspiration, Cmao20. As for the colors, I had a similar vibe, but still a tolerable one. I reduced the overall saturation by 15% and updated the transfer link above. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Overprocessed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Saturation, level and dynamics adjusted to a more acceptable level, transfer link above updated. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Radomianin’s version is a big improvement and I would suggest to use it, Crutch1973. I would certainly support that version. If you do not like it, Radomianin should upload it as a separate image under a new filename and I would be happy to nominate it here. – Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- On hold I've contacted Crutch1973, so I will wait with overwriting the photo a bit (one/two days). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Draceane, thank you in advance for the upcoming update. Funny coincidence: I also informed the user about this nomination in a very polite way by email shortly after 10:00 UTC today. So thank you for your efforts to rescue this nomination to give this great image a fair chance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:35, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Radomianin's version is an improvement, and potential FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info @Radomianin, Basile Morin, Aristeas, and Cmao20: I have updated the file with the Radomianin’s version. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 17:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the update, Draceane. Great shot, and FP-worthy after the edit, imo. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking panorama. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive panorama of a beautiful and diverse landscape. – Aristeas (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting scenery and light. BigDom (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Czech Republic#Ústí nad Labem

File:Mimetismo - Camouflage.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 13:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Thomisidae (Crab Spiders)
Info created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Maurizio Carlini -- Maurizio Carlini (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great timing and very high quality. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, really cool photo. Arguably DoF could be better but FP nevertheless for such an interesting subject Cmao20 (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary camouflage. The prey might have been fooled, as I was at first sight, confusing the flower and the spider! -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per supporters above. -- Radomianin (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:37, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first glance you can't see it... --Terragio67 (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For those who don't know, crab spiders can change colour to match the colour of the flower. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I will support once this is resolved - this photograph is an exact duplicate of this one, which is already a QI (the version nominated here isn't). One of these should be deleted and if this passes, as it appears it will, the quality assessments applied to the remaining file. BigDom (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Msb (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Thomisidae (Crab Spiders)

File:Bruco di Sfinge dell'Euforbia 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 16:27:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
Info Spurge Hawk-moth caterpillar - created by Maurizio Carlini - uploaded by Maurizio Carlini - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 16:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good to see such good images by uploaders who are not regulars on this page. Thanks for bringing this here, Civvì! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina; excellent work! As I've mentioned before, not everything has to be focus-stacked. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 22:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Focus stacking might have improved it but it remains superb for FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina and Radomianin, thanks Civviː A good colorful choice. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the colors. --Mile (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin, Cmao20, Mile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)

File:Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a bad photo, and it is a valuable addition to Commons. But it doesn't have the wow factor. The focus is somewhat shaky, it might be better (the other candidate image is sharp). The cropping seems somewhat random (the cropped top right skull and the right skull. It also has deficiencies in description, there is no proper category and no proper description: are these products in a store, or something else? --Tupungato (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request (@Tomascastelazo) Please write a more detailed description and categorize this picture. I would then support this picture. (The croppings don't shock me because it's a kind of photo where you don't mind, it's like photographing a bunch of oranges.)
Comment If you google Calaveras of day of the dead in mexico you will be surprised by the results. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I wanted to say is maybe the description could be a bit more detailed. You can explain for example where was this photo taken (in Mexico, right, but more precisely) : a shop, in a street, ...

It would also ease the categorization. Because for now, there is only 1 category to this file. And this category doesn't even exist... -- Wikisquack (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fine picture of an interesting motif but I miss a great composition in this one and it's a bit noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calavera of Frida Kahlo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 01:36:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The visible portion of skull on the right is annoying. I would support this candidate if it was cropped on the right, and if it had a better description and categorization. Because it lacks a detailed description, and I believe it can be better categorized (it's not even in the Frida Kahlo category). -- Wikisquack (talk) 13:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one has a great composition Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Weird and special. – Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 17:51, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I would support a crop on the right. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wikisquack. --Fernando (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it but have to agree with Wikisquack. Would definitely support if those issues are addressed. BigDom (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Figurines and statuettes

File:Val Sinestra. 10-10-2024. (d.j.b.) 07.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 05:27:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
Info Val Sinestra, waterfall over erosion field. Not a spectacular Niagara waterfall, but a small waterfall on its way to the Brancla mountain stream in the fall.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good quality as usual but I'm not sure I really love the composition. That big pile of rocks in the foreground tends to distract from the waterfall, which just meanders into the corner and off frame. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I could cut a bit off the bottom.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It lacks wow for me. Not an extraordinary subject nor composition. I don't think cutting off the bottom will really change something. The white balance seems wrong, like too pinkish (but that's fixable) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per Basile, I don't see what could make this picture one of our finest. Poco a poco (talk) 15:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The quality is excellent. You can even recognize some trees, like the pines on the right-hand side from the larches on the left-hand side. Maybe, the photograph could have been improved by a larger view towards the top. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sarcophage romain, Musée national des antiquités et des arts islamiques d'Alger.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 00:04:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like this one, it is overprocessed. There are weird elements at the bottom, a white line. Low quality at 2800 ISO, and narrow depth of field. Too many blurry areas -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but while this is interesting and well composed, you will struggle to get FP quality at 2800 ISO Cmao20 (talk) 04:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination

File:Monument to Genghis Khan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2024 at 11:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon - nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Genghis Khan as ruler not warlord; the monument is the focal point of the Government Palace in Ulaanbaatar. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject definitely has FP potential but here the symmetry is off and the image just isn't that sharp. BigDom (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing puddling position of Catapaecilma subochrea Elwes, (1893) - Yellow Tinsel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 06:13:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool and unusual butterfly. Image quality is imperfect but adequate. Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sumit Surai (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the colors - what a beautiful butterfly! --Kritzolina (talk) 06:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 13:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --Love the pattern and the detail. Emdosis (talk) 14:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)

File:Downtown Columbus View from Main St Bridge - edit1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 12:47:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#Ohio (section doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Paul Wasneski - uploaded by Bammesk - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It makes the city look very sleek Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I would prefer it a bit brighter, but otherwise very good composition. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#Ohio

File:Zimmermann nagelt Verschalung-20160531-RM-110839.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:00:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Carpenter working on a concrete formwork of a bridge. All by me Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Doesn't look safe to me, though Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Carpentry is not a harmless profession. The blue safety net can be seen at the bottom. He also works more upwards than forwards. The almost vertical angle makes it look more dangerous than it is.--Ermell (talk) 20:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  This is definitely not en:OSHA-compliant for those of us in the US, but occupational safety standards vary greatly by country and this is a worldwide project... Buidhe (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As a bridge engineer: yes! — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:38, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Union Bank Tower, Portland (2024)-L1006272.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 17:59:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The columns and staircase create a well-composed, harmonious flow of lines. The turquoise steps appear almost painted, forming a sculptural contrast to the white columns. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some denoising would help though. Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does anyone know what architectural style is this? --Gnosis (talk) 01:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As described on the article page, it's the International Style. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This architecture is like music, it has rhythm -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Photographs of this style of architecture can appear a bit boring; this is an excellent example how to show its subdued beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

File:مستشفى بن صميم من الداخل.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 13:16:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.~~

Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not a QI, in my opinion. Like this one, the picture should pass COM:QIC first, before being nominated here. Perspective issue, DoF, noise, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:British Army Westland WG-13 Lynx AH7 ZX616 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 14:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters
Info British Army Westland WG-13 Lynx AH7 (ZX616) at RIAT 2024, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 14:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail for a moving subject at a distance -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Helicopters

File:سد ميشليفن بزاوية بن صميم.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 13:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.~~

Cmao20 (talk) 13:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you want to nominate these you will have to explicitly withdraw the previous two. You can't just open two new ones because the others don't look like they are going to pass. Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 Done Thanks Done Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition doesn't work in my view, with the red roof at the bottom and the distracting foreground. Moreover, light and subject are not really impressive -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camello, Bidiyah, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 21:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Camel en route, Bidiyah, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but for me this one is QI but not FP. The power lines and reflections in the shop windows are just too distracting, and you can't see enough of the camel - a photo from the side of the truck would be better than one from the back, although I have no idea what the background would have been like then. Cool photo but not featured material IMO Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, never mind, I tried something else. Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1583 portrait of Sir Francis Drake.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 08:42:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
Info created by Jodocus Hondius I, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Contemporary portrait of Sir Francis Drake, celebrating his circumnavigation of the world, engraved by Jodocus Hondius during his residency in London, and later finished by George Vertue in the early 18th century.
Support -- Yann (talk) 08:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 09:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Questionable personality, but without question a good and typical portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits

File:Diver or chaman in Tin Tazarift.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 11:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small, level of detail not the best, the paintings here are not so interesting like in the last candidate. Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light, contrasts and drawings were better here in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FlammarionWoodcut.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 09:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Flammarion engraving is a wood engraving by an unknown artist that first appeared in Camille Flammarion's L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire (1888). The image depicts a man crawling under the edge of the sky, depicted as if it were a solid hemisphere, to look at the mysterious Empyrean beyond. The caption translates to "A medieval missionary tells that he has found the point where heaven and Earth meet..."

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science#Astronomy
Info created by Anonymous - uploaded by Sette-quattro - nominated by Sette-quattro -- Sette-quattro (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is one of the best available scans of the Flammarion engraving, a wood engraving by an unknown artist that first appeared in Camille Flammarion's L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire (1888). The image depicts a man crawling under the edge of the sky, depicted as if it were a solid hemisphere, to look at the mysterious Empyrean beyond. The caption translates to "A medieval missionary tells that he has found the point where heaven and Earth meet..."
Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 09:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Notable work of art, good reproduction. --Yann (talk) 09:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 04:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have loved this picture since my childhood because it shows human curiosity (it was printed in an astronomy encyclopaedia). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the same reason as Draceane. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Science#Astronomy

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Delias pasithoe (Linnaeus, 1767) - Red-base Jezebel (Male) WLB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 10:38:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 10:38, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2024 at 12:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info Human running gait - terminal swing to heel strike (runner with Asics Metaspeed Edge "Paris"; 2024 Ljubljana Marathon). My shot. --Mile (talk) 12:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2 I had luck with this shot. Showing running gait: runner going from terminal swing to heel strike. Hard part was to get at this focal, right angle in perfect background-foreground, fluorescent colors of (new ?!) footwear. Actually croped OOC, AdobeRGB (⇔ Uncalibrated). Good Educational value.
Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
- Is the picture free of any copyright issue concerning the Asics logo on the shoes?
- What gender and what age is the runner? I think you should include these kind of details in the file description. -- Wikisquack (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Male, but those Asics are Unisex. De minimis and its logo on 3D, shoes. Gender and runner, perhaps for winner, here is about tehnic. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good focus, colour/brightness contrast etc. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I rarely oppose, but I don't want FPC to become QIC. This image is technically well made, nothing to complain here, but it does not give me any kind of wow. --Granada (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Granada I wanted to write at Info, actually what friend asked me "How many tries did i have ?", he is profesional, i told 1/100, with new shoes 1/500. With Zuiko 50-200 mm + adapter, Single Focus maybe even less. Try it. Your sport shot are more by sharp angle, thats is easy shot. This angle is "worst" for photographer. That is big Wow for me...and obviously some profesionals too. --Mile (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're absolutely right, I take it the easy way. That's the reason I never get shots with a wow and never nominate at FPC. Granada (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 10:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual, and the short being black, like the background, makes the legs popping up within the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Granada, just two legs... -- Karelj (talk) 11:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual_sports

File:Porkkali Theyyam .jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 13:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Theyyam is a ritual art form of Kerala. Live performance.

All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh lights. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor lighting, poor framing, busy background; not even a QI, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shaikh Salim Chishti Ka Maqbara.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:04:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India
Info The Tomb of Hazrat Salim Chishti, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, is a mausoleum. It enshrines the burial place of the Sufi saint Salim Chisti, a descendant of Baba Farid, who lived in a cavern on the ridge at Sikri. Considered one of the finest examples of Mughal architecture in India, the mausoleum was built during the years 1580 and 1581 by Akbar, along with the imperial complex at Fatehpur Sikri near Zenana Rauza. created by Sharvarism - uploaded by Sharvarism - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 04:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great interplay of light and shadow. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info I took the liberty of refining the gallery link: …/Interiors/…. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really excellent Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:34, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is dreamlike and beauftiful. Great find, thanks for nominating it, Sumit! --Kritzolina (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 01:30, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crop is a bit tight at the top, and slightly too large at the left, in my view. But architecture and light are very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would make a horizontal perspective correction --Llez (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alaa :)..! 12:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#India

File:Kelly’s Olympian Bar & Diner, Portland (2024)-L1006267.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 04:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atmospheric street scene at night. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely capture of the night scene. --Sumit Surai (talk) 11:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good, but I would crop most of the road. Please see note. Yann (talk) 11:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, Yann! I've uploaded a new version in 16×10 ratio. @Radomianin, Sumit Surai: hope this works for you! Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I would crop even more, but yes, definitely better. Yann (talk) 16:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Yann for the suggestion and Frank for the update. The new cropping has emphasized the striking impression of the photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is looking better. Sumit Surai (talk) 14:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very low-key atmospheric. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood. Agree the new framing is better with less road, but I would keep it as is now, because the reflection with gradient colors is great -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

File:Assisi - Chiesa di San Pietro - Crocifisso - 2023-09-05 01-25-30 001.jpg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:37:46

Info - Reason to delist and replaceː Last year I took some photos in this very dark abbey from the year 1000 located in Assisi, but in the past I had no idea how to stitch two pictures into one. Only recently have I been able to propose what I really had in mind: to see great part of the austere medieval internal apse of the Abbey of St. Peter (Assisi, Italy). (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Terragio67 (talk) 16:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Really better. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 05:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Yann. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral → delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agricultural terraces in Anti-Atlas mountains near Tafraoute, Morocco.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:44:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco (section doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject doesn' really stand out, I'd have probably cropp a chunk at the bottom. Pretty but I don't consider that architecture extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice weather but according to the shadows of the bushes at the right, and my overall impression, the orientation of the light was not so cooperative, like a bit dull or hazy. Also the bottom-up viewpoint is highlighting a lot of the foreground with shadowy sides and not so much of the buildings. The houses at the right are in the shadow, hard to distinguish. I think another viewpoint, more from the left, and perhaps also higher in altitude, would have improved content enhancement -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per Poco a Poco. --Fernando (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile Morin –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The so called "foreground" is what this image is about - for me this is an excellent documentation of an agricultural method for arid climates. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Mosque at Constantine (15676686960).jpg, not featured, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Algeria (section doesn't exist yet)
Info The ceiling adornment at the Emir Abdelkader Mosque (built in 1994). It's the second-largest mosque in Algeria. Created by Dan Sloan - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool, although I wish it was more perfectly centered. Cmao20 (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Indeed really cool, quality degrades a bit towards the borders, but all in all very impressive. I took the liberty to change the gallery link to our special gallery for ceilings of religious buildings. I will add a section for Algeria there if this nomination succeeds. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Below the quality bar I'd expect for FP and the bottom crop is unfortunate causing also a lack of symmertry. If the subject would be complete I'd have gone for a square crop Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tripod would have helped, here. Unfortunately, a hand shot with high ISO and low depth of field impacts the quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. If you don't have a tripod at hand, simply place the camera on the floor, select ISO100 and a medium aperture. Je-str (talk) 11:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crop sucks but this will do. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In addition to the technical problems caused by the absence of tripod, the viewpoint was not in the center. As a consequence, the circles are not concentric. And the crop is tighter at the bottom than at the top, making the composition unbalanced -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At least crop sides - shadow part. It could be better, but tripod in Mosque, normally not possible. Even camera-photo can be problem. --Mile (talk) 11:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need for a tripod to a get a HQ shot from a ceiling. I have done it so many times... I'm surprised and disappointed by the support this image is getting. The camera was off-centered, so that the arches on left and right are not symmetrical at all, the cop is a mess and the quality low. Poco a poco (talk) 14:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose In the top left corner (please see annotation) there is a yellow coloration on the white surface, which indicates a subsequent coloring within a poorly made selection. However, this is only an assumption. Also, the saturation of the image seems too high to me. I would also suggest a square crop in favor of a more balanced composition. Also, I have to partially agree with the opponents above that the FP standard for church interiors is higher than this one. Nevertheless, the subject is great, and with careful reworking it would have a chance of becoming FP. I am very sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: If you look at the original version, you can see a more natural coloring. Another indication of subsequent editing, which in my opinion was not done carefully enough. I would like to ask the nominator/editor to place a retouching template with the done work on the file page. Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, feel free to edit the image and add the template. I have done my best to ensure that the picture aligns with the FP standards. Riad Salih (talk) 21:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, Riad Salih. I am sure you have done your best to meet the FP standard. For this, the community thanks you, because every volunteer is needed to keep this project alive. And your work is just as valuable as that of any other volunteer. But participation in this forum thrives on constructive criticism that helps the volunteers maintain the professional standards of the FP project. I too have evolved over the past few years by trying to accept criticism and develop my skills. My suggestion was only meant as an advice to provide with the template the necessary transparency on the file page. If my criticism was perceived as disrespectful, I sincerely apologize. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Château du Haut-Koenigsbourg (755 m) (Orschwiller) (19).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 09:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice compo but unsharp. Probably f/11 is a bit to much for 1 inch. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree with Mile, but the composition is great Cmao20 (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate version (sharpness)

Support Better sharpness. Gzen92 (talk) 12:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 20:42:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A New Zealand endemic. Both males and females have two distinctive white throat tufts which often appear to be just one tuft. No FPs. of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crown is blurry. White feathers near neck overexposed. --Tagooty (talk) 04:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's overexposed. I'm not a big fan of reducing bright white highlights so that they are a dull grey. There is a tiny bit of colour fringing around that area that you could work on but really a very minor point. Cmao20 (talk) 10:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with Tagooty Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition Henrysz (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tagooty. - Karelj (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Beautiful composition and colours, excellent posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely shot. --Fernando (talk) 10:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)

File:Keir Hardie by George Grantham Bain.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2024 at 16:54:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by George Grantham Bain - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 03:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The informtion on this image should note that this is an image of James Keir Hardie (15 August 1856 – 26 September 1915), a Scottish trade unionist and politician, taken in 1909 by the photographer, George Grantham Bain. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: I added a little more information about Hardie (and linked to his Wikipedia page for any further info), but other than a description of him, I'm not sure what of that isn't in the file description page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No obvious artifacts from the cloned-out text. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 08:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1900-1909

File:Samanea saman on an island with orange clouds and blue sky at sunrise from Don Det Si Phan Don Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 02:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
Info 2 FPs of this island, but none on that day and none with these clouds.. Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is really impressive, I have to admit. Suitable for a whole wall as a photo wallpaper :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The light is absolutely stunning but doesn't it need a perspective correction? Particularly when you look at the horizon on the left it looks like it's leaning to me. Cmao20 (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done I agree, Cmao20, because of the reflection that should be vertical. Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and constructive suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extraordinary sunrise and reflections. --Tagooty (talk) 04:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

File:Комплекс Пир-Сиддик 4.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 08:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure this is the perfect crop but I definitely find this interesting and unusual enough for FP Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the framing is good, the open door on the left and the pigeons flying up on the bottom right are part of the story and form a whole. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and kind image. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual, different from other nominations, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasing composition. --Tagooty (talk) 04:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Traditions

File:Cañon del Río Sil desde el mirador de Vilouxe.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 09:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Galicia (section doesn't exist yet)
Info all by me -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fernando (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I realise this may have been unavoidable, but the out of focus rocks in the foreground bother me a little, especially because they are not symmetrical. Cmao20 (talk) 10:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:36, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 12:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a bit late now, sorry, but I think this nomination would work better with the bottom cropped out (and part of the river too, but never mind, the island is safe). See note -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bottrop (DE), Tetraeder -- 2022 -- 0402.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 19:52:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I'm not sure if it also could fit into the FP gallery "Sculptures", as the Tetrahedron is somehow both – one and a tower. -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: This is a renomination. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- A. Öztas 19:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great motif and good light Cmao20 (talk) 23:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:27, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan Kekek and Daniel Case here. And it should be mentioned somewhere that it is the third nomination of this structure after this one and that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be complete at this point: One nomination did not reach the necessary total number of votes and the other was a different version of this picture, whose nomination I had withdrawn after less than a day. Without going any further into the discussion here, I should have included the reference above (as I subsequently did) when I nominated it. I didn't have in mind at the time that the photo had already been here before. -- A. Öztas 11:13, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule about it but it is generally the case that we don't renominate a picture that has failed unless significant improvements have been made to it since the previous nomination. My support still stands in this case, but it isn't normally something we would do. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, see this case for example, a few days ago -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have in mind that the structure had already been nominated twice? It's surprising. Anyway, too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The brief nomination that I withdrew after less than a day and the subsequent one felt like a single attempt to me and this was over a year ago – and quite a lot has happened since then. So yes, it simply slipped my mind. There's no reason to be surprised by that. It was pointed out, the reference was added, and that should suffice. As for the image, I understand that it might indeed appear a bit too dark. Whilst it can always change, at the moment it's just right for me, whether it's enough for an excellence rating or not. I appreciate your perspective and the time you've taken to review it. -- A. Öztas 16:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to discuss here. "Brief nomination" but still three oppose, one question and one comment during this short time. Thus quite a logical withdrawal, in my opinion. We can of course AGF, but reciprocally, we, reviewers, remember that the two similar nominations failed not so long ago, for assumed fair reasons. As Ikan Kekek rightly said in a similar case "Not voting also counts as a lack of interest". Usually, it is obvious to the nominators that a photo has already been nominated, because they need to add "/2" at the end of the file name to create a new FPC, but here the file page has been renamed twice recently. With still no metadata. Of course, since the voters are not always the same at FPC every month, it can happen that a picture which failed the first time is finally promoted by insisting. But you should also understand, as you wrote after the first nomination "I will nominate the original as FP with the reasonable assumption that it will be rejected anyway", that the picture will struggle to pass, even though several of us reiterate their efforts to evaluate again. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss about what? After the first answer from you and me, everything was already said, or am I wrong? Of course, we are welcome to deepen the discussion, precisely because it is a topic that affects many aspects of the FP nomination processes and often offers room for different perspectives. In this context, I would like to address a few points that touch on both the past of previous nominations and the general guidelines for repeat submissions. As I mentioned, the first nomination was over a year ago. This distance in the time frame plays a role in my opinion, as it makes it clear that I did not submit the nomination of the structure out of a constant repetition so that it would, as you wrote, "finally be promoted by insisting". The motivation lies more in the fact that I continued to reflect on the image over time and adapted my own view of it. As a photographer, I often experience such processes; a certain development of my own view of the image. Photography, after all, is a medium through which we capture not just what we see, but what we feel at a given moment. And as those feelings evolve, so too can our interpretations of our own work. This growth is natural and, I believe, valuable to the community's understanding of a work as it evolves through the eyes of its creator. At the same time, I understand that for reviewers like you and others who regularly participate in the discussions, there is a certain habit and reminder value when similar or identical images are up for discussion again. What this has to do with AGF here is beyond me. I'm not as familiar with the practice in this area, I'm only on my fourth photo here. I see your references to a previous nomination as a helpful addition and not a criticism per se. The process of weighing up between a possible repetition and the search for new qualities in an image is essential and is shown in the current case by the different feedback and views. I would also like to note that my decision to quickly withdraw the previous nomination should not be understood as an endorsement of a "logical withdrawal". There were several factors at the time, including personal considerations, that led me to withdraw the nomination. It is true that this first nomination was - albeit briefly - on the table and led to reactions, but the circumstances were more complex than they appear at first glance. In my opinion, such a withdrawal should not be seen as a weakening factor for the quality of the picture itself, but as part of the individual process that each artist has to deal with. Furthermore, I would suggest having a broader discussion about the weighting of nominations that have already failed. Of course, there is no doubt that a clear majority should decide the relevance and quality of an image, but there may be cases where an image changes its relevance and quality over time. This could be due to technical improvements, a change in the community's perspective or simply time showing the work in a new light. Such an approach may well make sense for some FPC nominations, particularly for those images that have failed in the past but could potentially find new appreciation. After all, everything and nothing is set in stone here. With regard to the question about the brightness of the image, I agree that this is a subjective judgement and certainly open to discussion. The incidence of light and the colour scheme reflect the mood that I wanted to capture when taking the photograph and are not just technical parameters for me, but part of the aesthetic that I want to convey. Of course, the comment that the image may be perceived as too dark is justified and a question of personal taste - however, it is precisely this difference between subjective perception and objective quality that often leads to divergent assessments. Light plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional resonance of an image, influencing how viewers perceive and connect with it on a deeper level. By intentionally choosing a darker, more subdued lighting, I aimed to create an atmosphere that goes beyond a straightforward representation of the structure itself. This darkness, though perhaps unconventional, allows subtle textures and contrasts to emerge, lending the image a mysterious quality that invites viewers to look closer and consider the piece in a contemplative way. The interplay between shadows and faint highlights, in my view, captures a sense of introspection and draws attention to the sculptural lines of the structure. While brighter lighting may provide more clarity or detail, this more moody approach aligns with the feeling I experienced when taking the photograph, reflecting a quieter, almost meditative atmosphere. Shadows add depth and a sense of timelessness to the scene, suggesting that the image captures not just a single moment but a feeling that could exist outside of time. This play of light and shadow is a deliberate choice, one intended to evoke curiosity and to invite viewers into the scene, allowing them to experience the piece not merely as an architectural object but as a structure with an almost enigmatic presence. At least that's how I feel about this one. In the end, I understand that every image will resonate differently with each person who views it, and I fully respect the diverse perspectives within this community. The beauty of these discussions lies in their ability to reveal new interpretations and insights, both for the artist and for those who critique the work. I look forward to read more of your perspectives in other discussions as well, as these exchanges are invaluable not only for our individual growth but also for enriching the shared vision of what we seek to highlight here. -- A. Öztas 05:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invaluable also is novelty :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above, sorry --A.Savin 08:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others.--Ermell (talk) 10:01, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admont - Ortsansicht.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 20:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Austria
Info created by Bwag – uploaded by Bwag – nominated by Draceane — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow for me Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful veduta. – Aristeas (talk) 11:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Austria

File:Pumpkin festival - Ludwigsburg 2024 - 30.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 15:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)
Info Happy Halloween!
Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a huge bunch! But is the white balance correct? Kind of orange cast -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice diverse texture. – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 20:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)

File:Слияние Оми и Иртыша в Омске.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info: a woman is waving at the departing Moskva-112 cruise ship at the confluence of the Om and Irtysh rivers in Omsk; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not seeing any big wow factor here, sorry. --Peulle (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not FP material for me. Uninteresting bush in the foreground and flat simple background. --Fernando (talk) 09:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per above, good quality but not FP composition or light Cmao20 (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:White dog sleeping on the floor with puppies after nursing in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 02:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sensitive, beautiful, and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this IMO is just adorable. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pictures of puppies is cheating. --Fernando (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)

File:Hollywood-1923-Poster-restored.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2024 at 21:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Poster for the 1923 film, Hollywood with Hope Drown as Angela.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Paramount Pictures - uploaded by WFinch - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There seems to be a weird join in the middle of the poster. Is that accurate to the source material? Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's in the original Ezarateesteban 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please remove the white line at the left. Yann (talk) 08:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks!!! --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 14:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 11:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Andalusian wall of Rabat, Marocco (السور الأندلسي بالرباط). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compared to your other recent FP I find this one less satisfying. The entrance itself is obviously a lot less eye-catching, but the main issue for me is that the half-pedestrian here gives the impression that she just wandered across your shot. To me, she is blocking our view of the subject, rather than being part of the composition like in the previous photo. BigDom (talk) 01:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per BigDom. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Low support. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Saint-Merri, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
Info Very high quality church interior with a special atmosphere. Note that the darkness of this church is correct for a photo taken at 5:47pm in October, I would not want it brightened because I think the twilight lighting conditions make it special. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Niiiicceee :) thank you Poco a poco (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric and authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rbrechko (talk) 12:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris

File:Pacific reef heron (Egretta sacra) dark morph Rarotonga.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 09:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta
Info One nice recent FP of a bird in non-breeding plumage. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Even though I know that there surely will be accusations of revenge voting, this is a matter of principle for me: as long as the categories aren't properly fixed, oppose. --A.Savin 15:51, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which categories should be fixed @A.Savin: ? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone else tell me what I need to do on categories please? The oppose vote could be inhibiting other voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't give a shit, right? Exactly same problem as back in Jan 2020 --A.Savin 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have found one error. I created a new Category:Pelecaniformes of the Cook Islands and placed it Category:Pelecaniformes by country. I did not categorize it under Category:Birds of the Cook Islands. Naughty me. I have now done so. I do wonder why the category structure places the Cook Islands under New Zealand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are LOTS of categories still to be fixed by you, be it Cook Islands or other regons. --A.Savin 18:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have done all Cook Islands already, but I am sure there are others and will try to identify them; but if this nomination is correctly categorized, you should not continue to oppose it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am really confused. I created Category:Insects of the Cook Islands for this image. You have deleted this category and replaced it with Category:Cook Islands. How is this better? There are 170+ different Category:insects by country. Why does the Cook Islands not get one? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You expect me to help you? Oh really? --A.Savin 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed, I replaced it by "Cook Islands" and not by "something by country", like you did with the category. Feel the difference?

I think also regarding the disability to learn, all the POINTy behaviour and false creations of categories, you are in no way better than ArionStar who is now indefblocked. But ArionStar is poor and you are rich and with huge supporters' fanclub, so yes, that was to expect that "some animals are more equal etc.pp." --A.Savin 08:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how you included the habitat. Nice shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Egretta

File:Weininsel Sommerach Luftbild-20221027-RM-155807.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2024 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Vines on the wine island near Sommerach. All by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:55, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Graphically appealing composition! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 19:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and for the long shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Party-poop oppose. No wow for me, with a drone such views are very easy to capture. Sorry --A.Savin 12:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Rijpe vruchten van Hertshooi (Hypericum). 17-08-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 05:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hypericaceae
Info Ripe berries of a (Hypericum androsaemum) Focus stack of 23 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 07:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition, colours and detail. --Tagooty (talk) 09:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 11:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Terragio67 (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Hypericaceae

File:Чинки плато Устюрт. Урочище Бозжыра.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 06:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Kazakhstan
Info created by Максат79 - uploaded by Максат79 - nominated by Екатерина Борисова -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 06:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's my first try to nominate image to FP, so I ask for help from experienced nominators If I made any mistakes. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did everything right, thank you for the nomination. About the picture: Great subject, the sky is a bit noisy which could be fixed. Unfortunately, there is a probable stitching error in the lower area that has created a blurred part (please see annotation). Suggested solution: Either contact the author and ask for help, or carry out extensive retouching on this file. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your review. I'll try to contact the author. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Optimized version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of denoising the sky a bit and reducing the above mentioned blurry (presumably) stitching error to an acceptable level. If the author is not available, please feel free to use this version for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great thanks! Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the colours are a bit overprocessed but it's cool anyway Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow is there but I agree with Cmao20 the picture is overprocessed. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Thanks to Radomianin for the editing! – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still too elaborate but nice composition and picture impressively positive in its dramatic narrative. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Cmao20/Basile — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Kazakhstan

File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating ~~five~~ ten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)

File:RNoAF Saab MFI-15 Safari 806 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per Basileː Shot of an expert hand. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft

File:Wadi Bani Khalid, Omán, 2024-08-17, DD 36-42 PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Oman

File:Akiem BB 37024 Port-la-Nouvelle - Leucate la Franqui.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:SE Facade Phuktal Zanskar Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00617.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Moroder — Preceding undated comment was added at 11:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-Atudu (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the improved version as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice subject but the sharpness could be better Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India

File:Road R104 in Anti-Atlas mountains, Tiznit Province, Morocco.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others. No wow. Yann (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2022-08-19 European Championships 2022 – Table Tennis by Sandro Halank–007.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist kein Problem der R3. Mit welchem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm arbeitest Du denn? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the information as structured data. --Sandro Halank (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great shot! --Granada (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot of this magician levitating a ball. I suspect that paddle has some sort of electric charge to keep the ball so still in the air. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

File:Taj and people framed.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natural History Museum London South Facade 2020 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I used to go to that place often when I lived in Londonː I recognize the mist in the early morning and the translucent colors of the regal building during the morning hours. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom

File:NE View Stongdey Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00966.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Beautifully composed image. Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

America
Europe
Asia
Africa
World

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm agree with Cmao. -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world

File:Close wing Basking of Neopithecops zalmora (Butler, 1870) - Common Quaker (7) WLB.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nautilus by Edward Weston.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Terragio67 (talk) 21:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda

File:Gotland Grand National 2024 128.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 15:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
Info Swedish rider Nils Anderberg during Gotland Grand National 2024. Created by ArildV - uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 16:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Nice action shot, plus a good composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very lively.--Ermell (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captivating angle and good quality. If you could bring a bit more space at the bottom, I think it would be amazing. But still FP in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Well balanced! -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you for nomination, votes and comments.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great action photo, well done Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressively beautiful shot, detailed, denoised without excess and with the bright background that does not disturb at all. Terragio67 (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Bruce1ee, Basile, Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Motorsports

File:New Zealand pigeon (Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae) Waitakere.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 21:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
Info Also known as the Kererū. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the best posture imo, but representative of the behaviour of the New Zealand pigeon. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ones we saw spent a lot of time eating! Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)

File:Шакал звичайний в Дунайському біосферному заповіднику.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 22:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
Info created by Максим Яковлєв - uploaded by Максим Яковлєв - nominated by Luda.slominska -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not particularly large and not very sharp either. For me, the level is higher with FP.--Ermell (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Ermell. It's a good QI, nice composition but a bit small for FP in 2024 for a reasonably common animal Cmao20 (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Have to agree with others — not very sharp image, thus lacking wow. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Zeus (Gerasa, Jerash - Jordan) - معبد زيوس.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 09:27:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Jordan
Info Temple of Zeus (Gerasa, Jerash - Jordan; معبد زيوس). My shot. - Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the picture is well taken and the ruins of the temple are great, of course. However, someone is selling T-shirts just there... a pity. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a problem at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Basile Morin But original. I dont know what is it. Will leave as it is. Stones are problem to "draw". --Mile (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 14:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Jordan

File:Interior view of the Geunjeongjeon Hall at Gyeongbokgung Palace in Seoul.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 05:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I doubt the symmetry of the left and right pillars. But maybe that wasn't symmetrical in reality either.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Famerborst. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive place and photograph. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The imperfect symmetry makes the picture interesting.--Ermell (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 14:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#South Korea

File:একজন মাদ্রাসার ছাত্র বায়তুল মকারাম মসজিদে নামাজ আদায় করছে.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support (sharpness, why not f/8 or closer?) --XRay 💬 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /BigDom (talk) 14:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh

File:Indiana State Library (35449p).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 21:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
Info The Browsing Room and Manuscripts Reading Room at the Indiana State Library. The symbols along the ceiling are American printers' marks. Most of the room is paneled with walnut, and those bookshelf finials are owls -- one of the symbols of the library. Two-frame panorama. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant central perspective, fascinating design of the ceiling. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice picture, but I see a few issues with frames stitching. You can find them on the wall above the lamps on both sides. Can this be fixed? --Rbrechko (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Always seem to miss a couple of those. These are going to be too tedious to fix for now, though. So I withdraw my nomination — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Post withdrawal votes

~~Support~~ --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice this nomination was withdrawned. MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo, the shelf on the right bottom corner and the table in the back behind the door are not adding up Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DRS Class 66 Culloden Viaduct.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 17:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and lighting --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 15:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as always Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another one from the master of the "trains in fabulous landscapes" genre of photography. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think he has long been promoted from Master to Grandmaster. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, viaduc, and, as always, picture taken at the right moment with the train -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding – excellent composition, beautiful light and colours. The surroundings appear a bit soft, especially the bushes and trees look somewhat mushy, but that’s probably unavoidable due to the small sensor of the drone camera. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michlifen Dam, Ben Smim Village.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful landscape but sorry, IMO not an outstanding composition Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagetes2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A photo of an orange Tagetes flower, slightly obscured by the surrounding dark green leaves

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Río Ameca.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: description and categorization improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - Vista notturna - 2024-09-21 20-07-45 001.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 21:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info This is one of my favorite photos that would like to represent simplicity and serenity. - c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. Wolverine X-eye 04:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. Composition, mirror image, sky with pink cloud, and blue hour lightings -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile; pleasant evening atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 09:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Truly wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful light, colours, and atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness could be better but a great shot overall Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnifique! --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy

File:Sunset over the Tumuli Park in Gyeongju Historic Site Wolseong District South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Drawn to the composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – the geometric shapes are appealing. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honestly, I think what Bruce said is what makes this photo so appealing.--SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The geometric shapes of the foreground, indeed, and also their contrast with the natural irregular shapes of the trees in the middle ground and of the mountains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#South Korea

File:Open wing Mud puddling position of Dichorragia nesimachus (Doyère,1840) – Constable (Male).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 01:36:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 01:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 01:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great subject but you need more than 1,4 megapixel nowadays for FP Poco a poco (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. Not even compliant with the minimum 2 megapixel requirement for FP. Great photo though. Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too small. Yann (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Baréin, 2024-08-18, DD 67.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Vote removed: I'm very sorry, but the voting period already ended at 13:53 (UTC) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain

File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info A Fijian endemic. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition. Beautiful red bird and tasty branch, good focus on both, smooth bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice compo & colours. --Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)

File:PacMan Nebula.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A real talent, see here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What an equipment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Sure! Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC) 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, great find. No coma, not even in the corners; maybe a little bit of spherical aberration, but it looks just natural here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:Large milkweed bug (23188).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo of that small creature. Please use just the gallery page link without a section anchor. If this photo gets promoted, I will add a section for the Lygaeidae family and move the photo to that section. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! Cmao20 (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Terragio67 (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice posture. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Terragio67 (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)

File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26

Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral → not delisted. /Yann (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tortuga carey (Eretmochelys imbricata), islas Ad Dimaniyat, Omán, 2024-08-13, DD 69.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 19:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
Info Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Support The crop is a bit tight. Yann (talk) 08:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yann: Cropped improved, thank you --Poco a poco (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely better. Yann (talk) 20:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fantastic resolution and quality. Love how angry he looks Cmao20 (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because I was in his way, I may have been too bold here...Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the improvement, Poco. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)

File:Alpsee - Hohenschwangau Castle - Alpenrose - Neuschwanstein Castle 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 14:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info The picture shows 3 Bavarian Architectural Monuments

Hohenschwangau Castle

This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.

Hotel Alpenrose

This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.

Neuschwanstein Castle

This is a photograph of an architectural monument.
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.

and 2 Protected Areas

This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID

395500

This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID

555537966

created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Somehow unsharp or high JPG compression. -- -donald- (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I made a new version from RAW --Llez (talk) 08:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama. The new version is a significant improvement, thank you! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed much better now, beautiful panorama. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool to see Neuschwanstein from a different angle with a lot more context! Cmao20 (talk) 02:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:A Misty Dawn, Dandenong Ranges.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 08:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
Info created and uploaded by Uzman Naleer - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice composition and atmosphere. —Bruce1ee^talk 09:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric, and it’s nice to discover the three kangaroos. Looks a little bit soft at first glance, but it’s just the mist which necessarily creates a soft impression. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The description may be improved. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very low res, but it's nice... Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria

File:003 Greater flamingo close-up in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture! -- Radomianin (talk) 23:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed close-up, nice light and smooth background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. Terragio67 (talk) 14:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)

File:Saslonch da Sacun Gherdëina.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The trees in the foreground are distracting. There are better locations for an outstanding image of this mountain range. --Milseburg (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated version available at SwissTransfer (2): Pinging @Fernando: The denoising should have been done before rescaling to avoid its potentiation on the sides. I re-edited it as best I could. If you are satisfied with the result, please feel free to use it for an update. Thanks to Poco and Rhododendrites for their helpful comments. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, Radomianin, that version looks much better Poco a poco (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Terragio67 (talk) 13:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain

File:La vuelta de Martín Fierro cover - 1879-restored.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in black and white
Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shooke ^{(Talk me in spanish, english or italian)} 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blue stamp removed, weird line under "Tacuari", and natural features deleted in comparison with the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-07-20-ColognePride Regenbogen-5959.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 21:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As the nominator --Superbass (talk) 07:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful night cityscape, good composition. – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, pleasant lighting mood. The artificial rainbow makes this image special. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting: A "straight" Rain"bow" ;-) --Llez (talk) 09:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Pre-pupation stage of Abisara bifasciata (Moore, 1877) - Double-banded Judy WLB.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 06:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Riodinidae (Metalmarks)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 12:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A fascinating macro photo. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality for the size -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 08:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An information about the size in the description would be useful --Llez (talk) 09:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is cool Poco a poco (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Riodinidae (Metalmarks)

File:Dülmen, Kirchspiel, ehem. Sondermunitionslager Visbeck, Bunker 26 -- 2024 -- 5531-5.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 08:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong symbolic meaning. One of my favorites from WLM Germany this year. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The darkness/light contrast makes this photo beautiful and a bit mysterious. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's mysterious on the site. We were there several times and two photo sessions were in almost complete darkness. Only a few parts are lit, including the interior of the bunker, which can be seen in the photo. --XRay 💬 14:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 01:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good light, quality and composition. The pattern is a bit reminiscent of some of our great pictures of traditional Korean and Japanese architecture.--ArildV (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia

File:Doberaner Münster, NW view, 2024-02-17.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 07:45:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Personally, I like the lighting and the cloudy sky in this northwest view of the Doberan Minster. From this location, the building appears clear only in winter, as the leafy trees obscure the view too much in summer. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and tranquil scenery with nice light emphasizing the facade of the Minster. This place can be very crowded, so it’s great to see the Minster without an irritating host of tourists. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Große Blaue Holzbiene Tagetes-20241026-RM-152720.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 10:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)
Info Large blue wood bee on a marigold flower. Focus stacked from 15 images. All by -- Ermell (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and very impressive with good light, vivid colours, the bits of pollen all over the body of the wood bee, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Can you explain how you take 15 photos on a shy living object in a maybe windy surrounding? -- -donald- (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell you that, even with no wind, bumble bees are extraordinarily difficult to capture like this. The focus-stacking software actually compensates for the flower moving in the wind or the photographer moving. The skill here is in capturing a moment when the bee was still. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles is right. I took 12 series of 20 pictures, one of which was usable. The fact that the camera can take over 100 pictures per second is very helpful. Of course I also used a tripod..--Ermell (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I dream about 100 pictures/second. No wonder I struggle with bees. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Stunning. Aristeas has put everything in a nutshell. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 15:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 00:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, stunning focus and DoF. Nice light and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per Aristeas' and Charles' points. Extraordinary and very difficult image, and, what's more, a very good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing composition, colors and focus stacking! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Apidae (Bumble Bees, Honey Bees, Carpenter Bees, Cuckoo Bees, Orchid Bees, and Stingless Bees)

File:Münster, Send, Riesenrad -- 2024 -- 6503.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 07:34:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Let me say a few words about the photo. Photographic art is always a matter of different opinions, but I would still like to nominate a photo here. It is a photo from a series of several photos. In each case, the basis was an illuminated Ferris wheel. The chaotic-looking image was created through the interplay of several shooting techniques: ICM (Intentional Camera Movement) and multiple exposures. The camera was moved in one direction on each of the 5 exposures, but in 5 different directions. The combination of the rotational movement of the Ferris wheel, the play of colors of the Ferris wheel and the linear movement of the camera results in this image. Although this type of shot produces similar photos, the result cannot actually be recreated or controlled. This is a special feature of the ICM technique. -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and fascinating work. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and good. Yann (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating, an excellent example for the potential of these creative techniques. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Innovative and an impressive result. POTY finalist? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting work. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent result -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)

File:56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created by Rbrechko - uploaded by Rbrechko - nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Rbrechko (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine

File:Общественная баня в Тюмени.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment an English description will be useful, what about graffiti? no COM:FOP in Russia for artworks and it ruins the picture IMHO Ezarateesteban 16:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These letters have some art style (not so original IMO, but still). Anyway, it's De minimis for me, while graffiti is an unwanted intrusion here and occupies less than 10% of the frame. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose There are some interesting elements like the balcony and also the bricked building, but the compo with that grey wall doesn't really work for me. I also expect a minimum of information in every FP nomination to understand what we are looking at Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:VNovgorod TradeArcades 4959.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry I don't find the structure extraordinary, nor the composition with the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zagedan Lakes, Mountain cirque, Caucasus Mountains.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique view, perfectly captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition, though the greens seem over-saturated. --Tagooty (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District

File:Big Ben Elizabeth Tower London 2023 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
Info Detail of Big Ben on the newly restored Elizabeth tower. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Existing FPs of the tower or Big Ben: Full tower, 2, 3, Clock face (all pre-restoration). — Julian H.^✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 22:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail and sharpness, esp. when we consider that this was taken at 500mm focal length. – Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gutes Foto, kann man nüscht sagen --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom

File:Annapurna South from Gandruk.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 10:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created by Carsten Nebel - uploaded by Carsten Nebel - nominated and digitally modified by Ratekreel -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ratekreel (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A beautiful composition but there is IMO too much contrast and the colours are oversaturated Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cmao20, contrast is mostly original. I added a bit and cleared the sky. I can rework the original file without adding any additional contrast. Ratekreel (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And remove some too. Ratekreel (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a different version. Can you check now? Ratekreel (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the new version is that reducing the contrast doesn't do much good because the detail in the shadows is already gone. It can't be recovered just from the JPEG. So you just end up turning dark black shadows into dull grey shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Original version is better. In 2022 A.Savin Also reverted to original V. And The house looks unnatural, sorry -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 16:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry. The original photo was taken by Carsten Nebel, so IMHO only small changes should be made by other users (see COM:OVERWRITE. Dear Ratekreel, if you want to make such substantial edits (which are obviously not uncontroversial), it would be much more polite and respectful to the original creator to upload the edited photo under a new filename and to link to the original photo with the {{Derived from}} template. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Thank you Aristeas for reminding me of COM:OVERWRITE. Ratekreel (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western kingbird (71748).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 17:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)
Info Western kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, satisfying picture Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, good light, posture and background. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Tyrannidae_(Tyrant_Flycatchers)

File:سد ميشليفن بن صميم.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тульчин. Старий палац (Потоцьких).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
Info Potocki Palace in Tulchyn (Ukraine) in sunset. All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:57, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine

File:Ansel-adams-monolith-the-face-of-half-dome - edit1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1929
Info created by Ansel Adams, restored and uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
Info Monolith, Yosemite National Park, California, by Ansel Adams, 1927. Gelatin silver print.
Support Notable photograph. -- Yann (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent restoration of one of the classic black-and-white scenery image that has stood the test of time. --Tagooty (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating this famous work, Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1920-1929

File:Забайкальская пустыня.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District

File:Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchateau (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support איז「Ysa」 23:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really well executed composition in adverse lighting conditions. Terragio67 (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Ghost Crab Burrow Mahabalipuram Sep24 A7CR 03085.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 11:08:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)
Info Pallid ghost crab (Ocypode pallidula) emerging from burrow, Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just taken at the right time. Yann (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Ocypodidae_(Ghost_Crabs_and_Fiddler_Crabs)

File:Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus) in flight Taveuni.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
Info On the Meridian (~International Date Line), so the photo may have been taken the day before! All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 12:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Isn't there a bit of blue fringing though? Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; but I was too late. Thanks, Wilfredo, for the edit. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well captured in flight. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)

File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by TonyTheTiger - uploaded by TonyTheTiger - nominated by TonyTheTiger. This is the first contribution using exposure w:bracketing and w:compositing by this editor. This images is one of two extracted from File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and cropped.jpg, which is an exposure bracketed picture composited on October 4, 2024 in Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.19.10.0 from two Raw file images taken on September 20, 2024. The best two other attempts at compositing that were made from the same exposure bracketed sequence have also been uploaded:File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg and File:20240920 6-41PM stacked R6 0341-0342-0343 rotated 15.56.jpg.-- TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is a solar w:diffraction spike in the context of an w:urban canyon (Avenue canyon per the article) at the golden hour. The canyon has a foreground with an intersection that features part of the w:National Register of Historic Places -listed w:Hotel Del Prado on the left diagonally across the street from part of the National Register of Historic Places-listed w:East Park Towers on the right. This composition of the canyon includes the top of the Chicago Landmark w:Hyde Park–Kenwood National Bank Building off in the distance on the left.--TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but while the light is nice I find the composition cluttered and not sufficiently interesting Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bac Fortress (4).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:36:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well composed and atmospheric Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The WB feels off Poco a poco (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poco a poco; this photo was taken at sunrise. --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of that, but it doesn't explain the greenish cast Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What is the light near the tower? — Yann (talk) 22:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yann; this is a spotlight fixed on the site. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Serbia

File:Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 HW-361 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 (HW-361) at the Royal International Air Tattoo 2024. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality. It's nice to see the interior with the guy checking his Facebook notifications :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Nice contrast between the red/white colours of the airplane and the blue sky. – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft

File:Abano Mineral Lake.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:00:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
Info created by David Osipov - uploaded by David Osipov - nominated by David Osipov. -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info
Support -- David Osipov (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Difficult light, lack of wow, not working compo Poco a poco (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Tiddis, Numidia, Algeria - 52573537881.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not as sharp as I'd like everywhere, but still good Cmao20 (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support nice image as usual, but what bothers me a bit is that the large column is clearly to the right of the center.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Alte Kirche St. Salvator (Pellworm) 17.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: per above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks Aristeas and Cmao20 for the suggestion. I tried to give a little more space at left to achieve symmetry. Please take a look. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - CommentI'm not that experienced either, but here is an example of a vote with an alternative version that was added. --Superbass (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
        If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
        
        If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
        
        If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
        
        If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
        
        Hope this helps, – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji 22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:68-104-0039 Kamianets-Podilskyi Bridge RB 18.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 09:42:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20; I love how the bridge seems to disappear in the haze. – Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikride (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Like the lyrical quality of this image. Suggest you add your comment about the lantern light as useful information in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support איז「Ysa」 23:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine

File:Zernez, Unterengadin, Graubünden. 20-09-2023. (actm.) 71.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
Info created by Agnes Monkelbaan - uploaded by Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming architecture. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting facade -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for posting my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming indeed --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice catch Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland

File:Mezquita Azul, Estambul, Turquía, 2024-09-30, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey
Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obviously amazing. Hope to see lots more of your Turkish photos. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cmao20: all of them are online now, here probably the best of them, if you want to have a look :) Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of good candidates here. This is particularly amazing! Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great architecure, very good framing and quality. – Aristeas (talk) 17:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing place, very good quality, perfect framing. --Benji 22:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Turkey

File:Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 18:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria
Info North side of Hochosterwitz Castle, municipality of Sankt Georgen am Längsee, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Austria

File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fog creates a wonderful atmosphere. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 11:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rbrechko. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rbrechko, and I love these old wooden steps. – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#South Korea

File:Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) Tiritiri Matangi 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 21:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A different look at the tui. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 06:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)

File:Caldeira Grande1 2023-02-25.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 00:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Caldeira Grande hot spring, Caldeiras das Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 08:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment similar image already featured -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this is distinct enough in terms of subject and composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Agree, very different from existing FP Cmao20 (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm not convinced about the compo. I've to say that I was there and couldn't either manage a great shot, Poco a poco (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regretfully Oppose per George Chernilevsky. IMHO existing FP is better. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Helix Bridge, Singapore (2023-11-24 08-43).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 12:07:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore
Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing place but a bit grey light and oversharpened. Poco a poco had a recent FP of this place that was IMO better. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bridge and building are nice, the lighthing is here no plus (at dusk or in the night it's much more interesting, example here) but the main problem here is the poor level of detail --Poco a poco (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really like that picture, Poco a poco. And I think it is sufficiently different from your other FP in light, time of day, and angle to be featured too. Would you consider nominating it? Perhaps some selective denoising first. Edit: and anti-aliaising in the water, then I think it'd be ready for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cmao20: Thank you for your feedback, I made those improvements. The file in in my magic category of FP candidates, so it's only a matter of time, patience :) --Poco a poco (talk) 18:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination – Thanks for the feedback. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pez cofre azul (Ostracion cyanurus), islas Ad Dimaniyat, Omán, 2024-08-13, DD 98.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 20:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Ostraciidae
Info Front view of a female boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Ostracion cyanurus has a maximum published total length of 15 centimetres (5.9 in) and is found in the Western Indian Ocean where it occurs in the Red Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula into the Persian Gulf as far east as eastern Iran. This species is found in areas where there is a moderate growth of coral at depths between 5 and 50 metres (16 and 164 ft). Ostracion cyanurus is a solitary species which remains in the vicinity of shelter. The apparent lack of smaller males may mean that this species is protogynous (sequential hermaphroditism). If the bluetail trunkfish senses danger is releases a toxin called pahutoxin, or ostracotoxin, into the water as a defence. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support How poisonous is the toxin? Cmao20 (talk) 03:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Around 2ppm.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remembers me this one --Llez (talk) 13:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, but this guy is free like a bird...Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Ostraciidae

File:Zagedan Lakes, Shores, Caucasus Mountains, Karachay-Cherkessia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 01:30:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flat light and dull colors, burnt sky with blown highlights and no wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctantly Oppose per Basile Morin as there are some good characteristics here. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac Gentau (11).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 19:51:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Atlantiques
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info we already have this one and this photo of this lake as FP. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The blurred faces and the an the lens flares are disturbing IMO.--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Good composition but I agree with Ermell Cmao20 (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We already have 4 FPs of this place taken on the same day a few minutes apart:

Same light, same environment, same flat sky. Sorry, this one would not be fundamentally different from the 4 others, as part of the mood. We should try to select the finest images (not all). I would be happy to review one of these lakes under different weather conditions (like this photo from 2010 with cows and vivid colors) for more diversity -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile Morin; thanks for your review. I I withdraw my nomination this image. --Tournasol7 (talk) 06:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:MK-07628-33 Gantheaume Point (Broome).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
Info created and uploaded by Martin Kraft - nominated by SHB2000 - SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great to see a 20 year old panoramic image in such good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good viewpoint/perspective: that the lighthouse appear so small between them makes the rocks even more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per other voters.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but there is some cw tilt Poco a poco (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Although I agree with Poco that there is certainly a small tilt, I think there might be also natural curvature of the far horizon (not much), to be taken into account, slightly mitigating the intensity of that tilt -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia

File:Мала Ростівка. Палац.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
Info Manor of Zabotin family in Mala Rostivka, Ukraine. All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikride (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose In my opinion this 18 mm lens creates excessive distorsions at the top. Also, the crop is too tight at the left, at the top and at the bottom, making the building cramped in the composition. Moreover, the leaves hiding the right side and the head of the statue are unfortunate. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Basile --Poco a poco (talk) 08:47, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Nikride (talk) 17:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sitno nov 2023.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Slovakia
Info The Sitno Peak in Central Slovakia, see from north-northeast. Created and uploaded by Michalsmr, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this wonderful late fall/early winter scene. Some of the trees are still showing their last reddish-brown leaves, the first snow is shining on the ground and the higher treetops, and the warm morning sun bathes the eastern (left) slope of the mountain in a glowing, warm light that emphasizes the contours. The contrast with the bluish shadows on the western (right) slope of the mountain lends depth to the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 18:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Slovakia

File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 139.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 19:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing people
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice catch! :) I made some improvements, I hope they are fine with you --Poco a poco (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure, nice composition and colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Standing people

File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the photo needs perspective correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not outstanding enough for me for FP, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs perspective correction but, sorry, although the building is nice, I don't think the light or composition are FP even after perspective correction. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, there is nothing featurable here. Strong tilt, lacks of perspective cotrrection, detail level not the best,...Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Please could you read Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:مستشفى بن صميم من الداخل.jpg and stop nominating pictures that fail at QIC? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a policy that requires an image to have a "QI" in order to be nominated here?

If so, please share it with me, as I didn't notice it.

Thanks Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule, but it is generally unlikely that a picture that does not pass QI will succeed at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And COM:I is mentioned both at QIC and FPC. Read COM:FPC: "Please read the complete guidelines before nominating." It's written in bold at the top of the page -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fields Yugar Tsarap Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00581.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: I've uploaded a version with more fields at the bottom. Do you think this is worth nominating as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Those are at the edges of the frame, cannot be fixed now. Thanks for the review. Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

Spondylus imperialis, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shell, impressive and very educative representation. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Different sizes? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Info No, the diameter of the valves themselves is the same (height 3.3 cm (without spines) in both, see description), but the spines have different lengths. --Llez (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Better if the images make them look the same size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing and educative, as always with your beautiful shell pictures. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special shape -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 10:04, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The pictures are excellent, but I agree with Charlesjsharp on the necessity that the two frames show the shell in the same scale. For two reasons: because it will have a major informative value, and because the pictures have been candidate as a set. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- - Comment But in this case, the second one would have a lot of black, empty space. That's why I didn't do that and only added a narrow, identical frame to both pictures (as I did with all my 4,500 other shell photos). It is clear from the description that both valves are the same size. --Llez (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, that would be the unavoidable drawback. I understand that the choice is between the characteristic style of your works, and the necessity of allow a visual comparison between the right and left valves. The same problem happens also for the Arcinella arcinella pictures (1, 2), but in that case it is less pronounced. According to me, the realistic representation of the dimensions of the valves should prevail. In other words, the two "black boxes" should have the same dimensions, when encircling the left and right valve of the same species. Of course, the mine is just an opinion, and it no way detracks from the excellence of your work. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - They look slightly different colours with the left one having faintly orange spikes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Info Yes, you are right. The right valve has faintlty orange spikes, the left one pure white. The colours are different in reality. --Llez (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae

File:Val Sinestra. 11-10-2024. (d.j.b.) 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)

File:Beilstein - Billensbach - Stocksberger Str. 14 - Werkstatt - Fenster mit Hopfenranken (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Window in a former joinery workshop in Billensbach, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. Hop has grown through another, broken window into the workshop and has draped its tendrils before this window. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is certainly a matter of taste. I liked the little confusion created by the plants growing inside of the window while we are looking out, I love the contrast between the pretty curves of the hop vines and the (almost) rectangular window, and the image gives a friendly, but consistent impression of rural decay. -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Excellent idea. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 18:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In addition to its composition, the scene captivates through nice backlighting, highlighting the beauty of transience. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 22:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as suggested here, per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Basile, thank you very much for your suggestion to nominate this photo! (I didn’t mention you right in my nomination because I didn’t want to give the impression that you were responsible – if the picture hadn’t met with approval, that would be only my problem. ;–) Now that we know that more people like the picture, I can thank you properly.) – Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see the shared enthusiasm. And I would support the other pictures too! Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows

File:Mandelbox mit farbigem Nebel und Licht 20241111 (color).png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 08:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Mandelbox variant covered by fog illuminated by three different colored light sources, motif and settings by Krzysztof Marczak, tweaks by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a great cover image for a textbook about mathematics for advanced learners. Who dares to say that math is boring … ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this image helps to render mathematics more interesting, it's the way to go :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics

File:Amphitheatre (Alba Fucens).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Of historical significance but IMO not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geocoding would be helpful --Llez (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Llez, done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I amended the camera location because it was on the other side of the arena. Terragio67 (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy

Faithful nomination delisted 2024-12-26 (8-1) per Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Amphitheatre (Alba Fucens).jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

File:Mycena haematopus, Burgundydrop Bonnet.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae

File:Veste Coburg Luftbild-20240811-RM-162430.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 22:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Veste Coburg, aerial view. All by -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent viewpoint and special building -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect perspective, good light and very good quality for a drone shot. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above... --Terragio67 (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to have an FPC right around the corner :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hard to understand why it only came 51st. Looks Top 10 to me. Much better than the one in 3rd place... Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria

File:Chara Sands before it rains - Kalarsky District, Zabaykalsky Krai, Siberia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 08:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info created and uploaded by Ellebedeva, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful subject. But at the lower left of the dune edge there is an abrupt transition to a blurred area that ends suddenly. There is also a blurred area at the top of the second dune edge ~~(please see annotations)~~. ~~This could be an indication of unlabeled retouching.~~ -- Radomianin (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ This is an intriguing scenery and I wanted to support it, but Radomianin’s annotations (thank you very much!) have given me a pause. These glitches are indeed irritating and the photo also seems to need a {{Retouched}} template. @Ellebedeva: Any chance that you could have a look at these issues? – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Abstain~~ per Radomianin and Aristeas. Unfortunately the photographer / uploader has been inactive since 2022 -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I'll check the photo and get back. Ellebedeva (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellebedeva: Many thanks for your reply and thank you in advance for your help in solving technical issues with your great photo. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for coming back, Ellebedeva, after 2 years absence. Please also try to fix these glitches before the FP is (speedy) promoted, because the file cannot be changed after. The photo is worth extra supports IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've checked up a raw file. These blurred areas are original. It's just the texture of the top layer of sand that's been blurred by the strong wind. I can provide a raw file but I don't understand how to attach it here. Ellebedeva (talk) 08:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellebedeva: Thank you very much for your efforts. I am sorry for misinterpreting the blurred areas. But we have had some manipulations in this forum in the recent past that were not openly communicated. The community has become very aware of this. So I apologize very much and we are looking forward to more great shots from you :)
⦁ I am asking Aristeas and Basile to re-evaluate the image. Thank you very much in advance. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great! Thanks for the notification. Amazing shot! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much, Ellebedeva, for looking into this and to Radomianin for the notification! An intriguing scenery, as I said above. – Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great capture with strong impact. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 10:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District

File:Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane 4.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 18:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting photo, but unfortunately the image needs a perspective correction. I took the liberty of creating an example. If you are satisfied with the result, feel free to use it for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I just saw that the image was supported on QIC after tilt correction. But in my opinion it needs the perspective correction mentioned above to at least become a QI. But it's still not enough for an FP, imo. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Boring lighting and subject, centered,...why would this picture be one of our finest? Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Definitely needs a perspective correction. Radomianin's change would move me to neutral but with the grey light I don't think I can get to support. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a QI, perspective problem. Flat light and the building is not spectacular -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To my defence I promoted it as QI because I though that the building is not cylindrical but rather conical Poco a poco (talk) 11:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samoan myzomela (Myzomela nigriventris) Upolu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 13:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A species endemic to Samoa. Only image on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and high quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)

File:Dark-eyed junco (21840).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:30:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passerellidae_(New_world_sparrows)
Info contre-jour dark-eyed junco. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful backlight which adds a nice little glow to the bird’s shape, at the same time good details and quality in the plumage. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passerellidae_(New_world_sparrows)

File:Black-naped monarch (33331083292).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanita caesarea mushroom.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 15:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Amanitaceae
Info All by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Interesting subject + good composition. But detail/sharpness is a little low. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good mobile phone but visible artifacts at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domesticated farm pig lying in the mud head covered in dry earth under the sun in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 05:21:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different, very interesting document of behaviour. – Aristeas (talk) 17:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some people pay a lot of money for mud baths like that :) Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the owners should rent their land and sell their wealth to mask manufacturers :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)

File:Viljandi linnusepargi rippsild 2024 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:53:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Striking composition + cool rainbow just about outweighs very mediocre image quality Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality mobile phone picture and only 3,732 × 2,488 pixels. Moreover, I'm not a fan of the extreme distorsions created by the extremely wide (13 mm equivalent) focal length (like here). Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CH.ZG.Zug Altstadt 02 16x9+R 16384x9216.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 15:58:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
Info Super high resolution photo of an historic Swiss town at blue hour, lovely composition and light, v good quality even at 151 megapixel full size. created by Roy Egloff - uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator —Bruce1ee^talk 17:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood and background. The composition works for me with the appealing lines of the footbridge -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely blue hour mood, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Switzerland

Granulated sea star, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 20:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Top view
Side view

Set following the criteria #3 A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea
Info Granulated sea star (Choriaster granulatus), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It's a large sea star of a maximum radius of about 27 centimetres (11 in) with a convex body and five short and rounded arms. Note: we have yet no FPs of the whole family Oreasteridae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent set Cmao20 (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a comfy bed cushion to me :-) Good quality for underwater photos -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea

File:6 pl du Gen Leclerc in Mont-de-Marsan (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 19:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info We already have this 3 photos (1, 2, 3) as FP taken at the same place and time. -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good architectural photography under nice light Cmao20 (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Nice blue hour but very common architecture for France (and Europe?) Standard police station like many others in different cities. Maybe a front view would have worked better with this symmetrical building? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Abstaining because leaning between {{Weak o}} and {{N}}, in favor of the nominator's vote that could be a {{S}}) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --EUPBR (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:201 Dome Mosque 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 21:45:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
Info Created by Azimronnie - uploaded by Azimronnie - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate scaffolding, and because the camera was not on the axis, as a result the towers at the right are leaning more than those at the left (unbalanced aspect) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. The subject is great and I personally don't mind the scaffolding but this kind of photo really should be centred. Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
Info Royal Air Force Falcons parachute display team. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support They are so close to each other, I hope their strings don't get tangled :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scene and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others

File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2020 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:52:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours + composition. Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the management of the space in this composition, and the special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 and Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile Morin. --ArildV (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite the similar viewpoint very different to the existing FP thanks to light, water and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh, that bridge reminds me to a lot of experiences 12 years ago Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Estonia

File:Flat-billed kingfisher (Todiramphus recurvirostris) Upolu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info A Samoan endemic with one other photo on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I prefer this one to the other :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty bird, great composition + quality Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)

File:Münster, Schlossplatz, Herbstsend, Kettenkarussell -- 2024 -- 6459.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good to see your 30-vote barbed wire photo again on the Main Page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Yes I know it's very difficult to take pictures at a funfair. I would tend to support this one too, but to be frank I don't like the wheel at the right (although some would say it adds some context, in my view it clutters the composition) nor the deformed people and buildings at the bottom at full resolution, due to the perspective. The crispy sharp central part is very nice, and the management of the light too -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Grand Menshikov Palace.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia
Info Grand Menshikov Palace, Saint Petersburg created by Godot13 - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fascinating and maybe valued image but to me an obviously non-centered image where there is no clear compositional reason or limitation preventing from getting it centered is not outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gythio Port, Greece - Diliff.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the light is nice in a part of it but the shadowed area, which is more than half of the image sp,oils it. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tilisuna Schwarzhorn.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mwanza flat-headed rock agama, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 20:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Full body view
Detail front view

Set following the criteria #3 A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)
Info Mwanza flat-headed rock agama (Agama mwanzae), Masai Mara, Kenya. The species has become a fashionable pet due to the male's coloration, which resembles the comic-book superhero Spider-Man. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Front view is really amazing. --Rbrechko (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both amazing to me. Another very good set. Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness and focus very good in both. Striking colors, yes, with a cape, it could inspire a new superhero called "agama-man" :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 06:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:34, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)

File:Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas, for me a dealbreaker. I'd support when fixed. Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, perspective correction necessary (see pole and walls at the compared with the walls at the right). --Llez (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Mile (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco

File:Peatäi muna (ting).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:36:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very noisy and too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with the critic about the noise - it is indeed visible in the image - I cannot agree that the photo is underexposed. The directional light from above excellently reveals the object's texture and creates an interesting three-dimensional effect. This lighting is clearly an artistic choice, not a technical error. In photography, there is no 'right' or 'wrong' lighting, but rather different artistic choices that support the image's idea and mood. In this case, this directed lighting gives the photo its intended dramatic effect. Janeklass (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Compare with the FP of the same gallery, from 2010, much better light, almost no noise, and higher level of detail at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the head louse itself, not the egg. :) Janeklass (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to distinguish :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My picture has an egg and the link you provided has a head lice. :D Janeklass (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but I would like to see it also :-) And it's from 2024 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral impressive, but as with the other nom it seems like it could be improved with post-processing. the hard part -- capturing such a detailed image of a tiny object on a clean background -- is over, and done well, so I hope to upgrade both of these votes soon. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Arcos de Mismaloya.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not enough "wow" for FP in my opinion, and the picture isn't really sharp. --Benji 22:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamsteed House Greenwich 2023 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom
Info Flamsteed House, the original observatory building at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution, quality, and light Cmao20 (talk) 23:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bottom is underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disturbing shadow. --Tagooty (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I can see that the points on the shadow. — Julian H.^✈ 12:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lesina, lo specchio del cielo.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 12:50:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info Sunsets are always beautiful to look at, so we at FPC are rightly very selective when it comes to promoting such images. But this candidate with a boat on Lake Lesina in Italy appealed to me immediately. So I'll give it a try and look forward to your feedback. One fly in the ointment is the lack of Exif data. This may simply be an editing error, as the author's latest uploads show a Canon EOS 5D Mark III as the camera used.
I think the choice of the current gallery is fine. But if the community thinks …/Natural phenomena#Sun or …/Water transport#Boats fits better, of course it will be changed. Created and uploaded by Nella Laquintana, nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Great interplay of purple, red and orange tones, the reflection is a particularly nice feature of the scene in combination with the balanced composition. Personally, I find the slight noise in the upper part of the image acceptable. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems a great example of her creative style. She was using Canon EOS 5D Mark III with EF24-105mm f/4L IS USM in 2017. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing light and awesome reflection. --Rbrechko (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, this is a breathtaking photo! There is no doubt about this. What is not understandable is the ripple of the boat's shadow on a completely calm water surface. At the very least, most of the clouds reflected to the right and left of the boat should also be rippled, but from what you can see the ripples are really too light and in my opinion they have a discordant angle compared to those visible on the boat. Try to zoom-in (getting closer) to the shadow produced by the boat to understand that the sea ripples inexplicably stop on the surface of the lake. Another aspect not to be overlooked is the sunlight which on the boat is too intense to be at sunset. It produces shadows that unquestionably indicate the origin of the natural light coming from the right, in fact the front part of the ship is also partially illuminated. The sunset, however, is clearly in front of us, yet at the back of the boat we can see a shadow that could be a rope or a stake to possibly anchor another boat. But on the right you can see the mirror of the free and serene Lesina's lake. There is no clear indication regarding the general indications and EXIF data present. The only clue about the photo (or maybe the fusion of two photos) which was taken in 2017. I am ready to change my mind and support the photo if the author or anyone else can counter my assumptions. --Terragio67 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Many thanks to Terragio67, I'm afraid you're right. I must have missed it during the first review. I had some doubts, but I was still unsure and decided in favor of the nomination. To be on the safe side, I will withdraw the nomination. After all, what good is it if an undisclosed manipulation later results in a delisting, which means trouble and extra work for all of us. Thank you again for your attention and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly believe that withdrawing the image is a wise decision. I am truly sorry to see that these elaborate compositions serve to deceive judges in photography competitions. Unfortunately today we try to amaze others even more and more dishonestly, also due to powerful generative AI tools... I greet you dearly, and I wish you a good weekend. Terragio67 (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your words and wishes, Terragio67. It was very thoughtful of you to respond so quickly. I am usually very picky when it comes to checking images. But fortunately four eyes are always better than two. Your comment saved us a lot of unnecessary work at FPC. It's just a shame that the WLE jury was so badly misled. Wishing you a relaxing weekend, too. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am really very sorry that you thought of an AI manipulation. I don't know where to start and I don't care at all. I love photography and if I uploaded these photos it is only to give a contribution to my land. This is a photo of a very particular place, Lake Lesina is separated from the sea by a thin strip of land, so at dawn and dusk, exceptional light conditions are often created and, when there is no wind, the lake becomes a perfect mirror, moved only by the slight movement of the boats. I uploaded other photos of this place on Wiki, always taken with the same reflex, Canon Eos 5D Mark III and with an EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM lens, I think the exif data are: 55mm - ƒ/8 - 1/200s - ISO 100. I hope I have answered your doubts, in any case I thank you for the attention you have given to my photos. Nella Laquintana (talk) 21:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your message, Nella Laquintana. Your photos are a great and valuable contribution to Commons and Wikipedia. However, since Commons is the media archive for all language versions of Wikipedia, and there is a requirement for fidelity and transparency, major retouching that does not accurately reflect reality must be openly labeled on the file page with the template {{Retouched picture}}. This is often forgotten by new contributors and is not a problem, but it is a requirement for experienced Commons photographers. Since the FPC forum is used to discuss the very best photos, such things are very important. Especially since there have been a number of recent discoveries that have led to the revocation of the FP status. Terragio67 discovered that the image was probably a composition of two photos. That's why I withdrew the nomination. This is not a drama and it's all about open and transparent communication. We just want to help. The community would be very happy if you would continue to contribute your wonderful images to Commons, as they add to the diversity for which we are very grateful. I hope I was able to give you a little glimpse behind the scenes, and I personally look forward to seeing more great images that we can nominate at FPC. Best regards and all the best, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind tone of your reply, I really appreciated it, but it seems I have not been able to eliminate your doubts. I have never contributed to Wikipedia and Commons before and I even had difficulty uploading photos, but as in all contests, the jury's decision is final, right or wrong. However, I would like to advise you, for the future, not to directly involve the authors in these discussions, because terms such as "deception" and "dishonesty" can greatly hurt the feelings of those who read, even if said in general and not directed personally, when instead you simply wanted to give a photo to the community, uploading it (among other things) in a very high definition, deception-proof. Thank you for your time. Best regards. Nella Laquintana (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nella Laquintana: Thank you for your reply, which I appreciate very much. However, I would like to respectfully disagree with you that we have not personally accused you of deliberate deception or dishonesty. Nor do we doubt your abilities or good intentions, quite the opposite. Mine and Terragio67's comments were an expression of opinion, not directed at you. If that impression was given, we apologise. The withdrawal of the nomination on the FPC is in part due to the rules that require retouching work to be labelled, as can be read here. Unfortunately, the indications point to retouching. However, I would like to emphasise that the community is very happy to have talented photographers like you in our midst. But the rules apply to all participants. I think I have said everything important at this point. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nella Laquintana: I fully agree with Radomianin's words. The allegations of dishonesty were aimed at a series of events that recently occurred with the removal of Featured Picture status from some previous photos. Please don't take personally an "OPPOSE" to a single photo of you although I understand that in this specific case it hurts deeply in the way it happened. This doesn't changes my respect for you as a photographer leader on the Italian Wikimedia. Kind regards. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Terragio67 for your kind reply. I noticed that you live in Italy, I would like to invite you to give yourself a gift: if you come to Puglia, go to Lesina at dawn or dusk. The town is small and does not offer much, but it overlooks the lake, with a low wall that allows you to immediately see the boats in deep water a few meters from the shore. If everything is clear, you will see the sky change color many times in a few minutes, giving you a beautiful show. But if there is a bit of fog, with some light clouds and you are lucky enough not to find wind, the show will be unforgettable and a simple cell phone or a compact camera will be enough to take spectacular photos, without needing to glue skies or anything else. With great honesty, I am not telling you this to plead my case, I love my photos too much to have to justify myself and, probably, I will have removed from above the boat some disturbing element that contrasted with my aesthetic sense, so I should have declared it, but I did not know. However, I would personally like to introduce you to this magical place, about 90 km from my home, and to make you change your mind about your observations, beyond the competition of the contest.

Thank you so much for your time and for the attention you have dedicated to my photo. Best regards and ... see you soon in Puglia! Nella Laquintana (talk) 07:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Withdrawal of the nomination for the reasons stated above. Many thanks to all the reviewers for your time and feedback. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 16:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burg Raueneck Orthophoto-20240922-RM-164730.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Raueneck Castle ruins, orthophoto. All by -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This one is not working for me, the profile is not really standing out and the right side in shadow isn't helping, either IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy to stroll along the paths through the ruins. Indeed the larger shadow areas are a bit unfortunate, but as they are shed by the high trees around the ruins it’s probably impossible to avoid them – if the photo was taken when the sky was overcast the whole image would look dull. Near the corners the quality deteriorates quickly, but that’s a typical problem with drone shots and has no impact on the main subject at all. – Aristeas (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria

File:023 Glossy ibis fishing in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 13:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good catch! --GRDN711 (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Open beak, weightless prey and trickle of water make this photo special -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good image of a Plegadis falcinellus. --Zzzs (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even if it was just the bird, it would be quite good, but with the prey it's definitely Featured worthy. --Tupungato (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis

File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info It’s not a good day for sailors. Pilot boat, Pacific Scout, in lashing rain and gale force winds (70 - 90 km/hour, with gusts to 110), comes in off the Salish Sea into the protection of the breakwater at Ogden Point Light, Victoria, BC Canada. The container ships keep coming up from Seattle or Tacoma and if the Pacific Scout can’t take off the pilot, then it will be some days before the pilot will land. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support spectacular to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice composition (fixed gallery category) —Bruce1ee^talk 06:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Famberhorst. There seems to be some chrominance noise, but I still find it acceptable. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood and light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst, Radomianin, Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zoomed quality is not perfect, but the overall wow factor, difficult weather is enormous, this is what Feature Pictures are all about! --Tupungato (talk) 22:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ǃ -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 08:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but most of the picture is not in focus Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lacks wow and oof. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition itself would be good, but the image is a little shaken (unstable camera), and the level of blown highlights (white areas on water) is unacceptable for a Featured Picture. But don't get discouraged, I've been a photojournalist for ~18 years, and still have problems with waterfalls :D --Tupungato (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings is nice and the weather a plus but those trees spoil the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:57, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very simple but IMO satisfying Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Cmao20, it looks like a beautiful painting to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the minimalism is what makes this photo really nice. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have changed the gallery link from Other objects in landscapes to Natural#Netherlands because most similar photos are on the “Natural” gallery pages. Your description (“horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area”) confirms that this is a photo of the landscape/nature. The dobbe and the fence are objects, but they are integral parts of the landscape, so we can still put this into the “Natural” gallery. (Thanks to Cart for the confirmation!) Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cart and Aristeas, Thank you very much for all the effort. I am happy with that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Netherlands

File:Self portrait (8618889472).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 10:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art
Info created by Stacey Svendsen, uploaded by Victorgrigas, nominated by Yann
Info Self portrait illustrating the mordançage technique of altering gelatin silver prints for artistic effect.
Support No FP for this technique yet. -- Yann (talk) 10:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive result with a poetic touch. – Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /– Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Photo art

File:001 Greater flamingo in flight in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An insect photographer (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic angle of view, good focus and high level of detail. Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Also beautiful light. – Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 19:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Ankit0908 - uploaded by Ankit0908 - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A different take, I like it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for the notification. Try the same smell next time, if they like it, they may visit again? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this unusual take. Full quality on butterfly. I understand the compromise in partially cropping shoes. We still get the full context (the other shoe with visible sock inside), but the crop is tight enough that the butterfly is quite big. --Tupungato (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile Poco a poco (talk) 23:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree that unusual takes are very welcome; and the butterfly itself is very sharp; just the crop partially spoils the effect. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Dourdou river in Trou de Bozouls (14).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 20:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Aveyron (the subsection “#Aveyron” for the department does not exist yet, will be created after promotion → Done)
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit chaotic at thumbnail but when viewed at full size it's really good. Cmao20 (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Full screen works convincingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good perspective and light. --Mile (talk) 10:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Aveyron

File:Zona arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla, México, 2013-10-11, DD 43.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 15:16:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico
Info IMO a dramatic composition that really gets across how spectacular this site must be. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ohh, that's a while ago, nice view :) I made some improvements (alone the export with a current processing algorithm helps) Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama, nice juxtaposition of the building (left) and the mountain (right). – Aristeas (talk) 19:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ratekreel (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Mexico

File:Val Montanaia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy (section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Scosse - uploaded by Scosse - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. Thank you for this information regarding this camera body -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the author to re-upload the image. --Civvì (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support on reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy

File:Felipe Gomes Rio2016b.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info 2016 Summer Paralympics - Felipe Gomes and sighted guide at 400m T11. Created by Fernando Frazão/Agência Brasil - uploaded by Materialscientist - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tupungato (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sport -- Striking capture, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 08:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

File:Zaaddozen van een beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 13-09-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 05:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Half-opened seed pods of a beech (Fagus sylvatica) Focus stack of 57 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PaestumPaestum (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, IIRC much better than some earlier attempt at focus-stacking of a beech seed pod. – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae

File:Phyllis Diller by Allan Warren.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1970-1979
Info created by Allan Warren, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I think this matches very well with the introduction of her article: "American stand-up comedian, actress, author, musician, and visual artist, best known for her eccentric stage persona, self-deprecating humor, wild hair and clothes, and exaggerated, cackling laugh." -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with wow-factor. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1970-1979

File:Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (12938).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:33:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa
Info Juvenile yellow-crowned night heron (Nyctanassa violacea). I prefer the version that shows more of the habitat, but it didn't go over well. Giving the alternative a shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp, attractive environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big eye. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Nyctanassa

File:Western wattled-honeyeater (Foulehaio procerior) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 21:34:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A bird endemic to Fiji. One other image on Commons. Found it sharing fruit with a parrot. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is what Featured Pictures should be all about. Not only is the photo visually pleasing, bird is somewhat rare (not a pigeon, mallard or tit). Bonus points for interesting setting (awesome fruit) and insect in focus. This is all around awesome. I can see this picture in ~top 20 of next Picture of the Year.--Tupungato (talk) 22:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent capture / story / action. I will happily support once the blue CA is removed from the branch and from the leg -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will sort when I can. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, better. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vitraux de la Sainte-Chapelle du Palais, the stained glass windows were built on the order of Louis IX of France. Anyway, this is one of the kings of France, as shown by his sceptre. Yann (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but comments are allowed too, as part of this "rating process" -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose And I'd like to add that "low resolution", "high ISO" and "narrow depth of field" directly concern the technical aspects of "the image itself", as you request. This photo was perhaps a fair candidate in 2012, but much less in 2024. And even at that time, a tripod would have helped to increase the quality. The edges are slightly blurry, especially at the top and at the left. The crop is very tight all around. Overall, it is a standard photo of stained glass, not an exceptional one, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is shown in this scene, who are the persons? --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, the person with the crown on the left is most probably Louis IX of France. Yann (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The execution is fine but I cannot see why this stained glass, among thousands, should be featured. In fact it looks too simple to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The value of this stained glass window is determined not by its artistic intricacy, but by the time of its creation – the 13th century.-- Ввласенко (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are more in the Category:13th-century stained-glass windows. And also from the 12th century and the 11th century -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Among all these images there is not a single one FP from Sainte-Chapelle (Paris). -- Ввласенко (talk)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Lovely photo. The different colours of the pots is the cherry on top of the cake. Cmao20 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry to discent. Composition, lighting or detail are not outstanding here IMHO. A well executed photo with a pretty subject but not outstanding to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea

File:Braunlage - Wurmberg 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 10:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info It's depressing: Almost all of the spruce forests in the Harz National Park have died in recent years, and over long distances only dead trees can be seen (see also [1], [2], [3], [4]); created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed very sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special texture -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could wish for a bit more detail resolution on the frontmost trunks, but this does not diminish the impressive texture effect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent texture considering the lacking of light. -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was in the Harz mountains in autumn 2021 at Josephskreuz (lookout tower with unique architecture), and it's rellay depressing somehow. You could see large areas of holes in forests, and a huge number of dead trees :( --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Pinaceae

File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 11:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A small grove of trees at sunset on an evening in early December. Massenbach district, Schwaigern, Germany. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I walked past this little grove of trees again and again, I noticed that, together with the reduced forms of the surrounding landscape, it had a simple but well-formed appearance. Of course something was missing. On a December evening, the setting sun coloured the clouds and gave the grove a slightly dramatic background. I like it when simple things show their beauty. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, pastels colors of the clouds, and the foreground that is like a painter's brushstroke -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colours --Tagooty (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice sky. --Rbrechko (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A paint --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:00:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky – Milky Way over the Elbrus, Russiа
Info created by Oliwok - uploaded by Oliwok - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite a lot of chroma noise. I don't feel strongly either way, but I'm not sure this is the quality we'd expect. Cmao20 (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{cmt}}~~ Support I did just add some notes to identify the portion of the Milky Way visible in the star field. It is the Serpens–Aquila Rift. The two main stats are Altair in the center of the image and Alpha Ophiuchi on the right. The third one, lower on the left, is Jupiter, that in August 2021 was in the constellation Capricorn. Several star clusters are also visible. I agree with Cmao20 on the fact that there is a lot of chroma noise, but the picture has some value. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I modified this file a little. I didn't do anything with the lighting, but I cropped it a little and changed the aspect ratio from 2:3 to 4:5 Janeklass (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.

Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.

Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. I agree that there are dark photographs which do not tolerate an increasure of the exposure – reproductions of dark paintings, some gloomy atmospheric landcape photographs, low-key photos etc. However I fail to see why this would apply to this photo, despite of the explanations. I have played a bit with this JPEG file and can confirm that a careful increase of the brightness works very well when at the same time the light parts are dialed down a bit. If you have a raw image or a 16 bit TIFF file, this should work even better. Of course you have all right to keep your photo as you think it should be (so keep it!), but I cannot support it here. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned before, this solution was intentional. I did try making changes but wasn't satisfied with the result. I can see that opinions are divided on this one - and I suppose not everyone has to like the picture. It's clear that I won't get much support for this image, but that's okay. I'm already looking forward to when this period ends and I can submit my next works 🙂 Janeklass (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support but I agree it should be brightened. if it fails, anyone could just upload a new [separate] version and nominate it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 03:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas Poco a poco (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction of an excellent example for a progressive poster of the 1920s. (This reduced style was ultra-modern then, and unlike many advertisings from the 1950s [not even to mention the terrible Nazi kitsch] it still works well.) – Aristeas (talk) 11:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements

File:Lichtenfels Lokschuppen Orthophoto -20231001-RM-160347.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 16:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks
Info IMO superb composition, quality, and subject. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent idea and realization. One of my favourites from WLM 2024/Germany. – Aristeas (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love geometric structures, clear lines and shapes in photography. Saubere Arbeit, Ermell! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geometrical shapes and patterns of the composition, and also rusty / decaying materials at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking perspective, geometry and colours.--Paracel63 (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well done aesthetic composition. I am sure you'll be able to take some good orthophotos in Hof, too ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Rail tracks

File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 19:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków, Poland. Created and uploaded by Jakub Hałun, nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know I know I know: Just like “all sunsets are beautiful”, all squirrels are cute ;–), we already got quite some nice squirrel FPs and we are very demanding when it comes to photos of common animals. But I can’t resist to nominate this one. The light is so beautiful, the colours are so good, the pose is so nice. Since my last move I am watching these little rascals on my walks and this is a very typical posture and behaviour. Bon appétit, dear squirrel, and congratulations to the photographer! -- Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good choice to nominate this irresistible rascal. Sometimes they can be very tame, the picture reminds me of the Łazienki Park in Warsaw, there they get incredibly close to people for a nut. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. This is also a special squirrel, looking at viewer with giant eyes, ears stretched, paws on belly, its booty well buried in his mouth :-) Yum -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Respublik (talk) 13:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place, good composition + light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —-Llez (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 01:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like it but I think that taking the picture from the back of the scultpure is not the best idea Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Fountains

File:Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - Paris - GT-01 - 2024.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 13:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info Architect Paul Abadie was commissioned to design the basilica, initially (1875), in a Romanesque-Byzantine style. He died in 1884, and then other architects continued his work with the result that a structure was obtained without a predominant characteristic, and for this reason unique in the world. Since 1900 this place full of meaning has been a symbol of Montmatre in Paris. c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice weather but the picture is not horizontal. See the two horses, not leveled. And not vertical either (see the walls leaning to the center on both sides) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I willingly corrected the verticals because a very slight convergence was actually visible with three-point perspective. Instead, the majestic staircase with gardens that leads to the basilica, and consequently the balcony where people are looking out, is not aligned with the basilica, because they have different angles. For this reason there remains a slight perspective shape whereby the horse on the right is slightly higher than the other. By the way, thanks for your comment. Terragio67 (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction of the verticals. About the horizontal lines, I'm sorry to disagree, after having taken the time to listen the arguments (Aristeas's in particular) and looking at maps, I believe that such a distance of the camera associated to such a minor angle (to the right) cannot realistically justify a strong horizontal inclination. This could be calculable geometrically :-)

I think this aspect is correct. Top AND bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile, thank you very much for your additional effort and for your edited version! My statement (below) was mostly about the obvious misalignment between the axes of the church and the balcony. You are right that this does not necessarily imply the strength of the horizontal inclination and hence of the differences of the height e.g. of the two horses or of the two minor domes. There must be some difference, and it should indeed be possible to calculate it, but this exceeds my possibilites. So it is quite possible that these differences could/should be smaller and more like in your edited version – which indeed looks very appealing. I would like to ask you to upload your edited version as a derivative file to Commons; I guess that many people would appreciate your version. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible in the next few days. Thank you very much, Aristeas, for your suggestion -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today I tried some adjustments based on the above considerations made during the FPC. I have to say that the result looks very good to me, with minimal changes. I would still be curious to see the derivative work from Basile.
@Aristeas , @Cmao20 , @Radomianin , @VulcanSphere , @Famberhorst , @Poco a poco , @Agnes Monkelbaan , @EUPBR , @Iwaqarhashmi , @Giles Laurent , @George Chernilevsky Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your efforts with this difficult object. If I'm honest, I like Basile's version the best. In this version the cross looks a bit crooked. But please wait with any further changes until the other colleagues have given their opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version. Improved from the previous one, in my opinion. This might be a guess, but mine above too, and I find the perspective credible in this case. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was confused by the perspective, but Terragio67’s answer has opened my eyes: the basilica and the stairs/balcony are indeed not on the same axis ([5]), so in any photo of the south façade either the basilica or the monumental stairs and balcony will look misaligned. In photos taken from further away this is less appearant, but still visible (see the category). I can’t blame the photographer for this. A brownie point for this photo: the perspective avoids the usual vast crowd of people in the foreground – there are still enough people in the photo, of course, but they appear rather few when compared to the commons shots from the stairs. – Aristeas (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to Aristeas for his detective work, and to Terragio67 for this fine image. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:25, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France

File:Puente Helix, Marina Bay, Singapur, 2023-08-16, DD 144-146 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 20:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
Info Night view of the Helix Bridge and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, Marina Bay, Singapore. Note: I've already a featured image of this area, this one taken a different day, with different light, from a different location and with the ArtScience Museum in the compo. I opted for this nom after the discussion that took place here. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Very different to the other FP in composition and light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but perspective should be improved. You can see pillars leaning and the reflections in the water are not vertical -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it this evening CET Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, FYI Basile Morin Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done. Special architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and very nice place. May there are some stars, may they light spots are hot pixel. Please have a look. --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning scenery and photograph. (I assume you will tweak the perspective acc. to Basile’s hint.) – Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the best night photos of MBS I've seen. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:59, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore

File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough and a bit distorted. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Field of Iceland poppies in the flower garden near Cheomseongdae Observatory in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 00:44:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just love the pet insect you placed on the flower! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:-) A divine hand placed many in that field. You have to wait less than one minute to get one (or two, three...) on any flower :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing detail for such a large expanse. --Tagooty (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems a bit too warm for the lighting conditions, especially the greens and reds in the foreground appear to have a strong yellow cast. I'm on an unfamiliar, uncalibrated monitor, though, so that may be just my perception being off. --El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. It's the original temperature, so I would expect accurate colors in this situation, at 8:22 am, almost golden hour. Colors also look normal on my calibrated screen. I agree it's quite warm, but I tend to believe that a colder temperature would correspond to a later time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's great as it is, but I reduced yellow a bit and that worked nicely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, and it’s impressive how you achieved constant sharpness without sacrificing too much detail to diffraction. – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 20:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden poppies -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:50, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#South Korea

File:Жирафик.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 21:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Giraffidae (Giraffes)
Info created by SanNikGar - uploaded by SanNikGar - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful picture, but bad crop and weird colours Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. And weird vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Artificial background... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colours and backlight are not well handled here. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Fungi Log Singanally Coorg Nov24 A7CR 04866-90 zsp.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 10:35:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae
Info Yellow green fungi (tentative: Trametes sp.) on log, growing around silver oak leaves. The large fungi are about 7.5 cm (3 in) across. Green colour may be due to algal growth. Focus stack of 25 images. Singnally, Somwarpet, Coorg, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family_:_Polyporaceae

File:Parkaden June 2017 08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2024 at 18:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info The upper part of Parkaden, a multi-storey car park built 1965 built by the luxury department store Nordiska kompaniet in Stockholm. The design is a combination of one express ramp and inclined parking ramps. Architect was Hans Asplund. Hans Asplund, son of the legendary architect Gunnar Asplund, and a architect and tarchitectural theorist most know today for Parkaden and Eslöv civic centre but also said to is have coined the term neo-brutalism. Over time, Hans Asplund became increasingly critical of modernism and, in 1980, published the book Farväl till functionalism, which systematically reviewed what the author considered to be the shortcomings of modernist architecture and his father's famous manifesto acceptera.
This is one of my own favorite pictures (I have a large enlargement in my apartment). I like the lines, the shadows and the contrasts and the, perhaps for many unexpected, beauty of this rather dilapidated sixties dream. The photo was taken before the upper floor was rebuilt. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great, interesting, abstract way to illustrate an ugly building Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Revealing beauty in ugly things is one of the great gifts of art (here: photography). – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very abstract. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden

File:Overturned basket with raspberries, white currants and roses - E H Stannard.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2024 at 09:45:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
Info created by en:Eloise Harriet Stannard - uploaded by Amitchell125 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the artist made many beautiful paintings, but this is something extra. And the wasps make it soo realistic... Who hasn't have wasp visit on the fruits/berries or near the coffee table in the summertime? // Zquid (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but this 1 megapixel image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Please try to find a higher resolution version and we would appreciate a new nomination. Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Comment @Radomianin "Featured picture candidates-rookie" mistake. I forgot to check the pixels. Sorry! // Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a problem at all, we have all made beginner's mistakes on this forum ;) Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Zquid (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

File:Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Moschino (73834).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2024 at 02:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info Moschino ensemble from the fall 2014 ready-to-wear collection, on display at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in the Camp - Notes on Fashion exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching, appealing composition and subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:36, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing and textiles

File:RDAF General Dynamics F-16AM Fighting Falcon E-006 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 10:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the cockpit -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! — Julian H.^✈ 07:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well frozen, beautiful colour contrast. – Aristeas (talk) 15:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. It's also nice how well the traces on the wings and the exhaust system are captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 14:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft

File:61-224-0001 Zbarazh Castle RB 24.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 11:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly not the most romantic one of the many castles and manors of the Ukraine, but the longer I look at it the more I like the clear geometric construction and how the fortress hides an imposing palazzo in fortezza. One hint: On the roofs of the palace there is some blue/orange/red moiree. In Lightroom or Photoshop/ACR, paint a brush mask over it and set “Moiree removal” e.g. to +60; it may be useful to increase (with the same mask) the saturation a bit, e.g. +20, because moiree removal often decreases saturation. If this is unclear, just drop me a note. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for review. I didn't notice moiree on the roofs. I fixed this and deployed new version. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Thank you very much! Now the roofs are perfect. – Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Svörtuloft Lighthouse.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 09:54:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)
Info created by C-M - uploaded by C-M - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great selfie! ;o) Yann (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the author near the table near the lighthouse? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 15:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --EUPBR (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 05:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Apparently a stitched pano, should be marked and categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape, impressive photo. The lighthouse is slightly leaning to the right, so maybe a tiny rotation or perspective correction would be useful. And obviously A.Savin is right that {{Panorama}}, Category:Panoramics in West-Iceland etc. should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 15:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas, I think the tower is visibly crooked.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Aristeas, would support if the perspective correction is applied Poco a poco (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Iceland#Western Region (Vesturland)

File:Ridotto Teatro Grande Brescia volta di Francesco Zugno e Francesco Battaglioli.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 13:35:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Part of the painting is hidden at the right. We just see a bit of an arm and of a head, because the camera was not in the axis. Also black distracting shape at the right in the foreground. Problem of composition in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm glad you say that, this is trompe-l'œil and the painter Francesco Battaglioli did a perfect job because the ceiling is flat. The black spots on the right are floodlights I could not hide.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~Good point :-)~~ Sorry, I don't read Italian (for the title) though I think the word Trompe-l'œil is missing there. Still, there is "flat" and "flat", and the camera doesn't seem in the axis. The bottom and the sides are not symmetrical. To be honest, at first sight my eyes were attracted by the distracting black shape. That part could be cropped out. The two columns at the bottom are showing the same perspective, as if the picture was taken from the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, I was tromped, the right part is missing. Trompe-l'oeil is in the English description, the other is just the filename. By the way I was going to delete my comment. You can see it in the other fotos of the painting.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re-updated comment Yes, after looking at this view I realized my first impression was rather right. And it seems also possible to take the picture from the center, like here. Thanks for your comment. -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And at least I was fooled a short time at thinking it was a real trompe-l'oeil :-) Is maybe worth visiting again :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it the way it is. Not every single Featured Picture has to be in the axis. This is a photo depicting a three dimensional object with details in variety of levels. I appreciate the fact that I can see the sculpted balustrade, which would be invisible or almost invisible in symmetrical axis composition encouraged by many Commons users. This perspective allows me to appreciate the painted ceiling, but also to better understand the surrounding architecture, which is a great thing taking into account Wikimedia Commons image should be encyclopedically useful. Don't get discouraged in submitting unusual perspectives for Featured Pictures. Other voters, don't be intimidated by seasoned users who discourage unusual perspectives. --Tupungato (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tupungato: "don't be intimidated by seasoned users" who spread unusual perspectives through optical illusions! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wow, “seasoned users” – I must remember that cultivated phrase. Very useful, as nobody can say for sure whether this is a respectful description or a refined insult. Well, every FPC regular knows that Basile and me often disagree, but when Basile is called a “seasoned user” I hope I am allowed to share this designation with him. Or am I already a rotten user, having been on Commons for six years longer? Who knows … ;–) But I agree that nobody should be intimidated by any other user, of course. Please take our arguments, check them, compare them, form your own opinion based on reasons, vote. Thank you. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm afraid I'm a "seasoned user" too: born in the first half of last century A.D. 1947, with commons for 17 years, 150 FP and 7000 QI hahaha --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Welcome to the club of seasoned users, Wolfgang! ;–) We should request a privileged users group with many “members only” features … – Aristeas (talk) 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a membership card please? ;o) Yann (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
only if you support my FP candidate ;-) Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:56, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Now you deserve one 💳 🥇:-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not too keen on the crop, but the photo itself is great Cmao20 (talk) 22:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:010 Greater flamingos male and female in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus on the pair, appealing light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Zero complaints from me. Wolverine X-eye 18:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote canceled due to sockpuppet abuse by Livioandronico2013 -- Radomianin (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)

File:Schloss Tambach Luftbild-20240901-RM-154500.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2024 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subject, composition and weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile, and excellent quality for a drone photo. – Aristeas (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:41, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria

File:Close wing moisture sucking of Appias lalage (Doubleday, 1842) - Spot Puffin (Male) WLB.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 04:59:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What is the blurry object in the background beneath the wing? Cmao20 (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a motion blurred droplot of water falling -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Okay then Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail, good focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 13:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)

File:Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 10:09:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info Camels at Aït Benhaddou, Saharan caravan route, Marocco (آيت بن حدّو, ⴰⵢⵜ ⵃⴰⴷⴷⵓ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)

File:П'ятницька церква вночі.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 12:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created by Andrew4you - uploaded by Andrew4you - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Big tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checked, image not tilted -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Building looks vertical but check the reflections please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, a part of the polished stone structure has a slight tilt. This is not a problem for the perception of the image as a whole and not a quality problem IMO. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You got the lighting spot on! Well done! Wolverine X-eye 18:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:28, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine

File:Vesilest (Hydrachnidia).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 07:38:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:31, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shot considering the subject you had to work with. Wolverine X-eye 18:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tupungato (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Here the darkness works well IMHO. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:35, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Others

File:020912 - Janel Manns - 3b - 2012 Summer Paralympics (01).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 14:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info Wheelchair tennis at the 2012 Summer Paralympics - Janel Manns. Created by Sport the Library - uploaded by Laurenrobertson1 - nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zquid (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very interesting. Unfortunately the crop is too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile and in fact the issue is making me oppose --Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:35, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The crop is indeed very narrow. Maybe(!) it is possible to extend the background on the image top with good image editing skills --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

Updated results:

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family of lions during the mating season.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 16:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info Good quality, a different composition to any of the lion pictures currently in the category, and taken on safari. created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Ain't no way was I going to pass the chance of supporting this absolutely magnificent, perfectly captured piece of art. Woah!! You have no idea how good this image is man. I don't think FP is enough! Wolverine X-eye 18:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolverine Je-str (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subjects, light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, good. Per others, and no annoying unsharp or blurry areas on the motif, and the composition is well handled. Both cats are looking into the same direction, both heading right, and a peaceful scene. As a little interpretation, the male lion has the control over the situation while the lioness is relaxing :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and PantheraLeo1359531. – Aristeas (talk) 15:02, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this was my nomination, it would have been opposed as being undercategorized. Better add Category:Panthera leo (male) and Category:Panthera leo (female)! Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The only thing that bothers me is that the display resolution is an extra 4 pixels high. Ugh! Anyway, this is a good image. --Zzzs (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:כיכר עין השמש (היובל) באשדוד, דצמבר 2023 06.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 19:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created by מקף־עברי - uploaded by מקף־עברי - nominated by מקף־עברי -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- מקף־עברי (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors

File:Seßlach Rodachbrücke-20180506-RM-191000.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2024 at 22:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
Info Rodach bridge in Seßlach. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming bridge with history and character; good light and atmosphere. I like how the statue of Saint (John of) Nepomuk seems to contemplate the facing wayside shrine … – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject (although it's a shame that we have no details about it) but I find the right crop too abrupt spoiling the compo, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 08:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany

File:035 Vertical panorama of the Milky Way during Perseids seen from Oeschinensee Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2024 at 21:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good idea to do a vertical pano Cmao20 (talk) 22:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 04:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! Also good to see variety in your nominations. A vertical strip of the milky way galaxy in this case :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The black foreground is too big, and there is nothing interesting there (compared with File:Milky way in Elbrus.jpg). Cropping that would improve the picture. Yann (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. I will crop approximately half of the foreground this evening once I'll have access to my computer -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done: new version uploaded with bottom cropped. What do you think now Yann? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, better. --Yann (talk) 07:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The new crop (or some middle course between the old and the new crop) improves the image. – Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann and Aristeas. Subtle sky and mountains. (But why don't you paste a church to get a POTY award? :-)) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:50, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

File:Burg Thurant im Morgennebel.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 11:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
Info created by Rolf Kranz - uploaded by Rolf Kranz - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 11:34, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mystical foggy atmosphere, good candidate and deserved 4th place at WLM. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m happy to see that the creator has improved the post-processing of his photos. While some of his WLM photos in the last years suffered from unfortunate post-processing, e.g. strong oversharpening, this photo has been handled with care and taste. – Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate

File:Червоний корпус на заході сонця.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 10:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
Info created by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - uploaded by Ryzhkov Oleksandr - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice but it needs a perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking red facade and pink combination with the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful atmospheric light and sky. – Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine

File:2024-11-17-Lower Manhattan-0593.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 22:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City
Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Superbass (talk) 22:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic sky, great colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 08:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 10:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible. Wolverine X-eye 17:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition with vanishing point and nice lights at an appealing time of day -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#New York City

File:Масив Близниці.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2024 at 21:55:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Landscape in the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve in the Zakarpattia Oblast. One of my favorites from Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Estolyarov - nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great landscape panorama in which, in my opinion, everything is somehow coherent and doesn't need any big words. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Foreground and background are in focus due to the very wide depth of field. Nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing much to complain about. Wolverine X-eye 17:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful highland landscape with excellent light and colours. – Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! --PierreSelim (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PaestumPaestum (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine